Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jake Smith
dblp:337/2731
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 46% Language models and text generation · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MOFDiff: Coarse-grained Diffusion for Metal-Organic Framework Design · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
equivariant diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MOFDiff: Coarse-grained Diffusion for Metal-Organic Framework Design · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MOFDiff: Coarse-grained Diffusion for Metal-Organic Framework Design · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What are the Desired Characteristics of Calibration Sets? Identifying Correlates on Long Form Scientific Summarization · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What are the Desired Characteristics of Calibration Sets? Identifying Correlates on Long Form Scientific Summarization · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › geometric graph neural network
equivariant graph neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MOFDiff: Coarse-grained Diffusion for Metal-Organic Framework Design · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability
faithfulness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | What are the Desired Characteristics of Calibration Sets? Identifying Correlates on Long Form Scientific Summarization · ACL (1) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
equivariant graph neural network · 1.5coarse-grained diffusion · 1.5calibration fine-tuning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | MOFDiff: Coarse-grained Diffusion for Metal-Organic Framework DesignabstractMetal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are of immense interest in applications such as gas storage and carbon capture due to their exceptional porosity and tunable chemistry. Their modular nature has enabled the use of template-based methods to generate hypothetical MOFs by combining molecular building blocks in accordance with known network topologies. However, the ability of these methods to identify top-performing MOFs is often hindered by the limited diversity of the resulting chemical space. In this work, we propose MOFDiff: a coarse-grained (CG) diffusion model that generates CG MOF structures through a denoising diffusion process over the coordinates and identities of the building blocks. The all-atom MOF structure is then determined through a novel assembly algorithm. As the diffusion model generates 3D MOF structures by predicting scores in E(3), we employ equivariant graph neural networks that respect the permutational and roto-translational symmetries. We comprehensively evaluate our model's capability to generate valid and novel MOF structures and its effectiveness in designing outstanding MOF materials for carbon capture applications with molecular simulations. Xiang Fu 0005, Tian Xie 0002, Andrew S. Rosen, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Jake Smith |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2023 | What are the Desired Characteristics of Calibration Sets? Identifying Correlates on Long Form Scientific Summarizationabstractone setup is more effective than another. In this work, we uncover the underlying characteristics of effective sets. For each training instance, we form a large, diverse pool of candidates and systematically vary the subsets used for calibration fine-tuning. Each selection strategy targets distinct aspects of the sets, such as lexical diversity or the size of the gap between positive and negatives. On three diverse scientific long-form summarization datasets (spanning biomedical, clinical, and chemical domains), we find, among others, that faithfulness calibration is optimal when the negative sets are extractive and more likely to be generated, whereas for relevance calibration, the metric margin between candidates should be maximized and surprise-the disagreement between model and metric defined candidate rankings-minimized. Code to create, select, and optimize calibration sets is available at https://github.com/griff4692/calibrating-summaries. Griffin Adams, Bichlien Nguyen, Jake Smith, Yingce Xia, Shufang Xie 0003, Anna Ostropolets, Budhaditya Deb, Yuan-Jyue Chen, Tristan Naumann, Noémie Elhadad |
ACL (1) | 3 |