Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingxiong Wang
dblp:337/8476
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 87% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 50% Systems and software security · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection
temporal action localization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Weakly Supervised Temporal Action Localization With Proposal-Level Action Consistency Learning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action detection › temporal action localization
weakly-supervised temporal action localization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Weakly Supervised Temporal Action Localization With Proposal-Level Action Consistency Learning · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2026 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Anomaly Detection Services for Blockchain Smart Contracts with Unknown Vulnerabilities · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Anomaly Detection Services for Blockchain Smart Contracts with Unknown Vulnerabilities · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
opcode sequence analysis · 1.0knowledge distillation · 1.0control flow graph analysis · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0LSTM · 1.0GIN · 1.0DeepSVDD · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Weakly Supervised Temporal Action Localization With Proposal-Level Action Consistency LearningabstractExisting weakly supervised temporal action localization (WTAL) methods typically follow a decoupled classification-localization pipeline: segment-level classifiers are trained first, and their predictions are then aggregated to score proposals at inference. Under this training-inference discrepancy, proposal scoring at inference relies on an additional aggregation step, which can accumulate errors from noisy segment responses and thus undermine score reliability. Moreover, proposal scores are often directly used as confidence without explicit score-quality modeling or quality-aware evaluation, further contributing to pronounced score-quality misalignment and thus widening the classification-localization gap. To address proposal score-quality misalignment, we propose ACL-Net, a framework for proposal score calibration. At its core is a dual-axis Proposal-level Action Consistency Learning (PACL) paradigm, implemented through two complementary modules: (i) a Semantic Consistency Module (SCM) that refines proposal representations by maintaining fused class centers to enforce compact and robust same-class features; within SCM, a cross-modal consistency-driven Classification Enhancement Module (CEM) denoises the fused class centers to mitigate error accumulation under weak supervision; and (ii) a Process Consistency Module (PCM) that derives geometry-aware reference scores from relative temporal relations among overlapping proposals, guiding the model to assess proposal quality in terms of relative process completeness and improve score-quality alignment. By jointly modeling semantic and process consistency to calibrate proposal scores, ACL-Net markedly improves localization accuracy. On THUMOS14 and ActivityNet1.3, it achieves state-of-the-art performance with uniform and substantial gains across multiple established baselines, while markedly lowering the expected calibration error (ECE). Maodong Li 0006, Zhihao Wang 0002, Tian Wang 0002, Jingxiong Wang, Jian Wang 0018, Bing Li 0010 |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 4 |
| 2026 | Anomaly Detection Services for Blockchain Smart Contracts with Unknown VulnerabilitiesabstractSecurity vulnerabilities in smart contracts can have severe economic consequences. Existing smart contract vulnerability detection methods rely primarily on rigid rules defined by experts and have difficulty in detecting unknown vulnerabilities. This article proposes a new Anomalous Smart Contract Detector, named ASCD, to effectively detect known and unknown vulnerabilities in smart contracts. This is achieved by interpreting unknown vulnerabilities as code anomalies and detecting them with an anomaly detection technique named DeepSVDD. This is also attributed to a new design of feature extraction, in which we compile smart contract source codes into opcodes, extract semantic features from opcode sequences, and control flow features from control flow graphs. By joining LSTM and GIN, the semantic and control flow features are fused to offer a comprehensive representation of smart contracts suitable for anomaly detection. Extensive experiments were conducted to verify the ASCD model, and more than 30,000 smart contracts were tested. The new model offers a significantly better F1-score than existing methods in detecting known vulnerabilities and achieves a high accuracy of 77% in detecting unknown vulnerabilities. Chunhong Liu, Zihang Sang, Jingxiong Wang, Wei Ni 0001, Wei Wang 0012 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 4 |
| 2023 | Knowledge graph embedding model with attention-based high-low level features interaction convolutional network
Jingxiong Wang, Fobo Shi, Duantengchuan Li, Yuefeng Cai, Jian Wang 0018, Bing Li 0010 |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 1 |