Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jessica He

dblp:337/9588 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2368-0099ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Human-AI interaction · 64% User interface design and tools · 29% Collaborative and social computing · 8%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › AI-mediated communication
AI disclosure
1.012026
"Better Ask for Forgiveness than Permission": Practices and Policies of AI Disclosure in Freelance Work · CHI 2026
Human-AI interaction
human-AI co-creation
0.912025
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation · CHI 2025
User interface design and tools
design principles
0.812024
Design Principles for Generative AI Applications · CHI 2024
Human-AI interaction
AI-mediated work
0.312026
"Better Ask for Forgiveness than Permission": Practices and Policies of AI Disclosure in Freelance Work · CHI 2026
Collaborative and social computing
creative collaboration
0.312025
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation · CHI 2025
User interface design and tools
user experience design
0.212024
Design Principles for Generative AI Applications · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey study · 1.0interview study · 1.0survey · 0.9practitioner feedback · 0.8literature review · 0.8design validation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "Better Ask for Forgiveness than Permission": Practices and Policies of AI Disclosure in Freelance Work
abstract
The growing use of AI applications among freelance workers is reshaping trust and relationships with clients. This paper investigates how both workers and clients perceive AI use and disclosure in the freelance economy through a three-stage study: interviews with workers and two survey studies with workers and clients. Findings first reveal a key expectation gap around disclosure: Workers often adopt passive disclosure practices, revealing AI use only when asked, as they assume clients can already detect it. Clients, however, are far less confident in recognizing AI-assisted work and prefer proactive disclosure. A second finding highlights the role of unclear or absent client AI policies, which leave workers consistently misinterpreting clients’ expectations for AI use and disclosure. Together, these gaps point to the need for clearer guidelines and practices for AI disclosure. Insights extend beyond freelancing, offering implications for trust, accountability, and policy design in other AI-mediated work domains.
Angel Hwang, Senya Wong, Baixiao Chen, Jessica He, Hyo Jin Do
CHI4
2025 Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
Jessica He, Stephanie Houde, Justin D. Weisz
CHI1
2024 Design Principles for Generative AI Applications
abstract
Generative AI applications present unique design challenges. As generative AI technologies are increasingly being incorporated into mainstream applications, there is an urgent need for guidance on how to design user experiences that foster effective and safe use. We present six principles for the design of generative AI applications that address unique characteristics of generative AI UX and offer new interpretations and extensions of known issues in the design of AI applications. Each principle is coupled with a set of design strategies for implementing that principle via UX capabilities or through the design process. The principles and strategies were developed through an iterative process involving literature review, feedback from design practitioners, validation against real-world generative AI applications, and incorporation into the design process of two generative AI applications. We anticipate the principles to usefully inform the design of generative AI applications by driving actionable design recommendations.
Justin D. Weisz, Jessica He, Michael J. Muller, Gabriela Hoefer, Rachel Miles, Werner Geyer
CHI2