Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arpit Kumar Rai

dblp:337/9930 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 50% Database theory · 25% Data mining · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management
cohesive subgraph mining
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Graph data management › cohesive subgraph mining
core decomposition
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Database theory
hypergraph decomposition
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Data mining
pattern mining
0.712023
Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

peeling algorithm · 0.7parallel implementation · 0.7local algorithm · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Neighborhood-based Hypergraph Core Decomposition
abstract
We propose neighborhood-based core decomposition : a novel way of decomposing hypergraphs into hierarchical neighborhood-cohesive subhypergraphs. Alternative approaches to decomposing hypergraphs, e.g., reduction to clique or bipartite graphs, are not meaningful in certain applications, the later also results in inefficient decomposition; while existing degree-based hypergraph decomposition does not distinguish nodes with different neighborhood sizes. Our case studies show that the proposed decomposition is more effective than degree and clique graph-based decompositions in disease intervention and in extracting provably approximate and application-wise meaningful densest subhypergraphs. We propose three algorithms: Peel, its efficient variant E-Peel, and a novel local algorithm: Local-core with parallel implementation. Our most efficient parallel algorithm Local-core(P) decomposes hypergraph with 27M nodes and 17M hyperedges in-memory within 91 seconds by adopting various optimizations. Finally, we develop a new hypergraph-core model, the (neighborhood, degree)-core by considering both neighborhood and degree constraints, design its decomposition algorithm Local-core+Peel, and demonstrate its superiority in spreading diffusion.
Naheed Anjum Arafat, Arijit Khan 0001, Arpit Kumar Rai, Bishwamittra Ghosh
Proc. VLDB Endow.3