Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brandon Augustino
dblp:338/2747
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8265-1779ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 60% Quantum computing and quantum information · 40% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum semidefinite programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mirror prox · 0.9mirror descent · 0.9dual averaging · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient MethodsabstractWe study quantum algorithms based on quantum (sub)gradient estimation using noisy function evaluation oracles, and demonstrate the first dimension-independent query complexities (up to poly-logarithmic factors) for zeroth-order convex optimization in both smooth and nonsmooth settings. Interestingly, only using noisy function evaluation oracles, we match the first-order query complexities of classical gradient descent, thereby exhibiting exponential separation between quantum and classical zeroth-order optimization. We then generalize these algorithms to work in non-Euclidean settings by using quantum (sub)gradient estimation to instantiate mirror descent and its variants, including dual averaging and mirror prox. By leveraging a connection between semidefinite programming and eigenvalue optimization, we use our quantum mirror descent method to give a new quantum algorithm for solving semidefinite programs, linear programs, and zero-sum games. We identify a parameter regime in which our zero-sum games algorithm is faster than any existing classical or quantum approach. Junhyung Lyle Kim, Brandon Augustino, Dylan Herman, Enrico Fontana, Jacob Watkins, Marco Pistoia, Shouvanik Chakrabarti |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Improvements to Quantum Interior Point Method for Linear OptimizationabstractQuantum linear system algorithms (QLSAs) have the potential to speed up Interior Point Methods (IPMs). However, a major bottleneck is the inexactness of quantum tomography to extract classical solutions from quantum states. In addition, QLSAs are sensitive to the condition number, and this sensitivity is exacerbated when the Newton systems arising in IPMs converge to a singular matrix. Recently, an Inexact Feasible Quantum IPM (IF-QIPM) has been developed that addresses the inexactness of QLSAs. However, this method requires a large number of gates and qubits to be implemented. Here, we propose a new IF-QIPM using the normal equation system, which requires fewer gates and qubits. To mitigate the sensitivity to the condition number and other input data-related parameters, we use preconditioning coupled with iterative refinement to obtain better complexity. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on IBM Qiskit simulators. Mohammadhossein Mohammadisiahroudi, Zeguan Wu, Brandon Augustino, Arielle Carr, Tamás Terlaky |
ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. | 3 |
| 2022 | Quantum-enhanced Regression Analysis Using State-of-the-art QLSAs and QIPMsabstractQuantum computing has the potential to speed up machine learning methods. One major direction is using quantum linear algebra to solve linear system problems or optimization problems in the machine learning area. Quantum approaches in the literature for different types of least squares problems demonstrate speedups w.r.t. dimension but have disadvantages w.r.t. precision and condition number. In this paper, we discuss how an iterative refinement scheme can deliver an accurate solution without the excessive cost of Quantum Linear System Algorithms (QLSAs). In addition, we propose an adaptive regularization approach that can mitigate the effect of condition number on solution time. In the second part of this paper, we investigate how state-of-the-art Quantum Interior Point Methods (QIPMs) can solve more sophisticated regression problems such as Lasso regression and support vector machine problems, which can be reformulated as quadratic optimization problems. Mohammadhossein Mohammadisiahroudi, Zeguan Wu, Brandon Augustino, Tamás Terlaky, Arielle Carr |
SEC | 3 |