Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Narendra
dblp:338/6282
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
class-conditional coverage |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Ensuring Class-Conditional Coverage for Pathological Workflows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Ensuring Class-Conditional Coverage for Pathological Workflows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Ensuring Class-Conditional Coverage for Pathological Workflows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Ensuring Class-Conditional Coverage for Pathological Workflows (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
classwise conformal prediction · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Ensuring Class-Conditional Coverage for Pathological Workflows (Student Abstract)abstractConformal Prediction (CP) is an uncertainty quantification framework that provides prediction sets with a user-specified probability to include the true class in the prediction set. This guarantee on the user-specified probability is known as marginal coverage. Marginal coverage refers to the probability that the true label is included in the prediction set, averaged over all test samples. However, this can lead to inconsistent coverage across different classes, constraining its suitability for high-stakes applications such as pathological workflows. This study implements a Classwise CP method applied to two cancer datasets to achieve class-conditional coverage which ensures that each class has a user-specified probability of being included in the prediction set when it is the true label. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a significant reduction in the average class coverage gap compared to the Baseline CP method. Siddharth Narendra, Shubham Ojha, Aditya Narendra, Abhay Kshirsagar, Abhisek Mallick |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | M3PO: Massively Multi-Task Model-Based Policy OptimizationabstractWe introduce Massively Multi-Task Model-Based Policy Optimization (M3PO), a scalable model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) framework designed to address the challenges of sample efficiency in single-task settings and generalization in multi-task domains. Existing model-based approaches like DreamerV3 rely on generative world models that prioritize pixel-level reconstruction, often at the cost of control-centric representations, while model-free methods such as PPO suffer from high sample complexity and limited exploration. M3PO integrates an implicit world model, trained to predict task outcomes without reconstructing observations, with a hybrid exploration strategy that combines model-based planning and model-free uncertainty-driven bonuses. This approach eliminates the bias-variance trade-off inherent in prior methods (e.g., POME’s exploration bonuses) by using the discrepancy between model-based and model-free value estimates to guide exploration while maintaining stable policy updates via a trust-region optimizer. M3PO is introduced as an advanced alternative to existing model-based policy optimization methods. Aditya Narendra, Dmitry Makarov, Aleksandr I. Panov |
IROS | 1 |