Daniel Lammers

dblp:338/8066 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9134-8568ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 73% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 27%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 62% Electronic design automation · 38%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › integrated circuit security
FPGA security
0.812024
Stealing Maggie's Secrets-On the Challenges of IP Theft Through FPGA Reverse Engineering · CCS 2024
Hardware security and side channels
intellectual property theft
0.812024
Stealing Maggie's Secrets-On the Challenges of IP Theft Through FPGA Reverse Engineering · CCS 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › block cipher
AES
0.712023
A Thorough Evaluation of RAMBAM · CCS 2023
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel countermeasures › masking
glitch-resistant masking
0.712023
A Thorough Evaluation of RAMBAM · CCS 2023
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
masking countermeasure
0.712023
A Thorough Evaluation of RAMBAM · CCS 2023
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.712023
A Thorough Evaluation of RAMBAM · CCS 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
symmetric cryptography
0.712023
A Thorough Evaluation of RAMBAM · CCS 2023
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.212024
Stealing Maggie's Secrets-On the Challenges of IP Theft Through FPGA Reverse Engineering · CCS 2024
Electronic design automation › circuit analysis
netlist analysis
0.212024
Stealing Maggie's Secrets-On the Challenges of IP Theft Through FPGA Reverse Engineering · CCS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reverse engineering · 1.5case study · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Stealing Maggie's Secrets-On the Challenges of IP Theft Through FPGA Reverse Engineering
abstract
Intellectual Property (IP) theft is a cause of major financial and reputational damage, reportedly in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars annually in the U.S. alone. Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are particularly exposed to IP theft, because their configuration file contains the IP in a proprietary format that can be mapped to a gate-level netlist with moderate effort. Despite this threat, the scientific understanding of this issue lacks behind reality, thereby preventing an in-depth assessment of IP theft from FPGAs in academia. We address this discrepancy through a real-world case study on a Lattice iCE40 FPGA found inside iPhone 7. Apple refers to this FPGA as Maggie. By reverse engineering the proprietary signal-processing algorithm implemented on Maggie, we generate novel insights into the actual efforts required to commit FPGA IP theft and the challenges an attacker faces on the way. Informed by our case study, we then introduce generalized netlist reverse engineering techniques that drastically reduce the required manual effort and are applicable across a diverse spectrum of FPGA implementations and architectures. We evaluate these techniques on six benchmarks that are representative of different FPGA applications and have been synthesized for Xilinx and Lattice FPGAs, as well as in an end-to-end white-box case study. Finally, we provide a comprehensive open-source tool suite of netlist reverse engineering techniques to foster future research, enable the community to perform realistic threat assessments, and facilitate the evaluation of novel countermeasures.
Simon Klix, Nils Albartus, Julian Speith, Paul Staat, Alice Verstege, Annika Wilde, Daniel Lammers, Jörn Langheinrich, Christian Kison, Sebastian Sester, Daniel E. Holcomb, Christof Paar
CCS7
2023 A Thorough Evaluation of RAMBAM
abstract
The application of masking, widely regarded as the most robust and reliable countermeasure against Side-Channel Analysis~(SCA) attacks, has been the subject of extensive research across a range of cryptographic algorithms, especially AES. However, the implementation cost associated with applying such a countermeasure can be significant and even in some scenarios infeasible due to considerations such as area and latency overheads, as well as the need for fresh randomness to ensure the security properties of the resulting design. Most of these overheads originate from the ability to maintain security in the presence of physical defaults such as glitches and transitions. Among several schemes with a trade-off between such overheads, RAMBAM, presented at CHES~2022, offers an ultra-low latency in terms of the number of clock cycles. It is dedicated to the AES and utilizes redundant representations of the finite field elements to enhance protection against both passive and active physical attacks.
Daniel Lammers, Amir Moradi 0001, Nicolai Müller, Aein Rezaei Shahmirzadi
CCS1