Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Rudikov

dblp:338/9862 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning › physics-informed neural networks
partial differential equation solving
0.812024
Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
conjugate gradient method
0.812024
Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
iterative solver
0.812024
Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving · ICML 2024
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver
0.712023
General Covariance Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solvers · ICML 2023
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.712023
General Covariance Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solvers · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural operator · 1.5flexible conjugate gradient · 1.5general covariance · 0.7coordinate transformation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Neural operators meet conjugate gradients: The FCG-NO method for efficient PDE solving
abstract
Deep learning solvers for partial differential equations typically have limited accuracy. We propose to overcome this problem by using them as preconditioners. More specifically, we apply discretization-invariant neural operators to learn preconditioners for the flexible conjugate gradient method (FCG). Architecture paired with novel loss function and training scheme allows for learning efficient preconditioners that can be used across different resolutions. On the theoretical side, FCG theory allows us to safely use nonlinear preconditioners that can be applied in $O(N)$ operations without constraining the form of the preconditioners matrix. To justify learning scheme components (the loss function and the way training data is collected) we perform several ablation studies. Numerical results indicate that our approach favorably compares with classical preconditioners and allows to reuse of preconditioners learned for lower resolution to the higher resolution data.
Alexander Rudikov, Vladimir Fanaskov, Ekaterina A. Muravleva, Yuri M. Laevsky, Ivan V. Oseledets
ICML1
2024 Quantization of Large Language Models with an Overdetermined Basis
abstract
In this paper, we introduce an algorithm for data quantization based on the principles of Kashin representation. This approach hinges on decomposing any given vector, matrix, or tensor into two factors. The first factor maintains a small infinity norm, while the second exhibits a similarly constrained norm when multiplied by an orthogonal matrix. Surprisingly, the entries of factors after decomposition are well-concentrated around several peaks, which allows us to efficiently replace them with corresponding centroids for quantization purposes. We study the theoretical properties of the proposed approach and rigorously evaluate our compression algorithm in the context of next-word prediction tasks, employing models like OPT of varying sizes. Our findings demonstrate that Kashin Quantization achieves competitive quality in model performance while ensuring superior data compression, marking a significant advancement in the field of data quantization.
Daniil Merkulov, Daria Cherniuk, Alexander Rudikov, Ivan V. Oseledets, Ekaterina A. Muravleva, Aleksandr Mikhalev, Boris Kashin
UAI3
2023 General Covariance Data Augmentation for Neural PDE Solvers
abstract
The growing body of research shows how to replace classical partial differential equation (PDE) integrators with neural networks. The popular strategy is to generate the input-output pairs with a PDE solver, train the neural network in the regression setting, and use the trained model as a cheap surrogate for the solver. The bottleneck in this scheme is the number of expensive queries of a PDE solver needed to generate the dataset. To alleviate the problem, we propose a computationally cheap augmentation strategy based on general covariance and simple random coordinate transformations. Our approach relies on the fact that physical laws are independent of the coordinate choice, so the change in the coordinate system preserves the type of a parametric PDE and only changes PDE’s data (e.g., initial conditions, diffusion coefficient). For tried neural networks and partial differential equations, proposed augmentation improves test error by 23% on average. The worst observed result is a 17% increase in test error for multilayer perceptron, and the best case is a 80% decrease for dilated residual network.
Vladimir Fanaskov, Tianchi Yu, Alexander Rudikov, Ivan V. Oseledets
ICML3