Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neta Glazer

dblp:339/0335 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning paradigms · 27% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 26%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
1.012026
Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
1.012026
Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
auxiliary learning
0.712023
Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization
0.712023
Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.712023
Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-task optimization
task balancing
0.712023
Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312026
Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR · AAAI 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › negotiation
bargaining game
0.212023
Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convergence analysis · 1.3bargaining game · 1.3logit lens · 1.0linear probing · 1.0activation patching · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASR
abstract
Interpretability methods have recently gained significant attention, particularly in the context of large language models, enabling insights into linguistic representations, error detection, and model behaviors such as hallucinations and repetitions. However, these techniques remain underexplored in automatic speech recognition (ASR), despite their potential to advance both the performance and interpretability of ASR systems. In this work, we adapt and systematically apply established interpretability methods such as logit lens, linear probing, and activation patching, to examine how acoustic and semantic information evolves across layers in ASR systems. Our experiments reveal previously unknown internal dynamics, including specific encoder-decoder interactions responsible for repetition hallucinations and semantic biases encoded deep within acoustic representations. These insights demonstrate the benefits of extending and applying interpretability techniques to speech recognition, opening promising directions for future research on improving model transparency and robustness.
Neta Glazer, Yael Segal-Feldman, Hilit Segev, Aviv Shamsian, Asaf Buchnick, Gill Hetz, Ethan Fetaya, Joseph Keshet, Aviv Navon
AAAI1
2025 Few-Shot Speech Deepfake Detection Adaptation with Gaussian Processes
Neta Glazer, David Chernin, Idan Achituve, Sharon Gannot, Ethan Fetaya
INTERSPEECH1
2025 FlowTSE: Target Speaker Extraction with Flow Matching
Aviv Navon, Aviv Shamsian, Yael Segal-Feldman, Neta Glazer, Gil Hetz, Joseph Keshet
INTERSPEECH4
2024 Open-Vocabulary Keyword-Spotting with Adaptive Instance Normalization
abstract
Open vocabulary keyword spotting is a crucial and challenging task in automatic speech recognition (ASR) that focuses on detecting user-defined keywords within a spoken utterance. Keyword spotting methods commonly map the audio utterance and keyword into a joint embedding space to obtain some affinity score. In this work, we propose AdaKWS, a novel method for keyword spotting in which a text encoder is trained to output keyword-conditioned normalization parameters. These parameters are used to process the auditory input. We provide an extensive evaluation using challenging and diverse multi-lingual benchmarks and show significant improvements over recent keyword spotting and ASR baselines. Furthermore, we study the effectiveness of our approach on low-resource languages that were unseen during the training. The results demonstrate a substantial performance improvement compared to baseline methods.
Aviv Navon, Aviv Shamsian, Neta Glazer, Gill Hetz, Joseph Keshet
ICASSP3
2024 Keyword-Guided Adaptation of Automatic Speech Recognition
Aviv Shamsian, Aviv Navon, Neta Glazer, Gill Hetz, Joseph Keshet
INTERSPEECH3
2023 Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Game
abstract
Auxiliary learning is an effective method for enhancing the generalization capabilities of trained models, particularly when dealing with small datasets. However, this approach may present several difficulties: (i) optimizing multiple objectives can be more challenging, and (ii) how to balance the auxiliary tasks to best assist the main task is unclear. In this work, we propose a novel approach, named AuxiNash, for balancing tasks in auxiliary learning by formalizing the problem as generalized bargaining game with asymmetric task bargaining power. Furthermore, we describe an efficient procedure for learning the bargaining power of tasks based on their contribution to the performance of the main task and derive theoretical guarantees for its convergence. Finally, we evaluate AuxiNash on multiple multi-task benchmarks and find that it consistently outperforms competing methods.
Aviv Shamsian, Aviv Navon, Neta Glazer, Kenji Kawaguchi, Gal Chechik, Ethan Fetaya
ICML3