EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yididiya Y. Nadew
dblp:339/0727
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 59% Reinforcement learning · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 56% Approximation and online algorithms · 22% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
gaussian process factor analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation › expectation-maximization
variational EM |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unified Projection-Free Algorithms for Adversarial DR-Submodular Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unified Projection-Free Algorithms for Adversarial DR-Submodular Optimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
combinatorial bandits |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural response modeling
neural spike train modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data Augmentation · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bandit feedback · 2.1variational EM · 1.5sparse gaussian process · 1.5natural gradient · 1.5data augmentation · 1.5offline approximation algorithm adaptation · 1.3projection-free algorithms · 0.8frank-wolfe · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Unified Projection-Free Algorithms for Adversarial DR-Submodular OptimizationabstractThis paper introduces unified projection-free Frank-Wolfe type algorithms for adversarial continuous DR-submodular optimization, spanning scenarios such as full information and (semi-)bandit feedback, monotone and non-monotone functions, different constraints, and types of stochastic queries. For every problem considered in the non-monotone setting, the proposed algorithms are either the first with proven sub-linear $\alpha$-regret bounds or have better $\alpha$-regret bounds than the state of the art, where $\alpha$ is a corresponding approximation bound in the offline setting. In the monotone setting, the proposed approach gives state-of-the-art sub-linear $\alpha$-regret bounds among projection-free algorithms in 7 of the 8 considered cases while matching the result of the remaining case. Additionally, this paper addresses semi-bandit and bandit feedback for adversarial DR-submodular optimization, advancing the understanding of this optimization area. Mohammad Pedramfar, Yididiya Y. Nadew, Christopher J. Quinn, Vaneet Aggarwal |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Conditionally-Conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Analysis for Spike Count Data via Data AugmentationabstractGaussian process factor analysis (GPFA) is a latent variable modeling technique commonly used to identify smooth, low-dimensional latent trajectories underlying high-dimensional neural recordings. Specifically, researchers model spiking rates as Gaussian observations, resulting in tractable inference. Recently, GPFA has been extended to model spike count data. However, due to the non-conjugacy of the likelihood, the inference becomes intractable. Prior works rely on either black-box inference techniques, numerical integration or polynomial approximations of the likelihood to handle intractability. To overcome this challenge, we propose a conditionally-conjugate Gaussian process factor analysis (ccGPFA) resulting in both analytically and computationally tractable inference for modeling neural activity from spike count data. In particular, we develop a novel data augmentation based method that renders the model conditionally conjugate. Consequently, our model enjoys the advantage of simple closed-form updates using a variational EM algorithm. Furthermore, due to its conditional conjugacy, we show our model can be readily scaled using sparse Gaussian Processes and accelerated inference via natural gradients. To validate our method, we empirically demonstrate its efficacy through experiments. Yididiya Y. Nadew, Xuhui Fan 0001, Christopher J. Quinn |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit FeedbackabstractWe investigate the problem of stochastic, combinatorial multi-armed bandits where the learner only has access to bandit feedback and the reward function can be non-linear. We provide a general framework for adapting discrete offline approximation algorithms into sublinear $\alpha$-regret methods that only require bandit feedback, achieving $\mathcal{O}\left(T^\frac{2}{3}\log(T)^\frac{1}{3}\right)$ expected cumulative $\alpha$-regret dependence on the horizon $T$. The framework only requires the offline algorithms to be robust to small errors in function evaluation. The adaptation procedure does not even require explicit knowledge of the offline approximation algorithm — the offline algorithm can be used as black box subroutine. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework, the proposed framework is applied to multiple problems in submodular maximization, adapting approximation algorithms for cardinality and for knapsack constraints. The new CMAB algorithms for knapsack constraints outperform a full-bandit method developed for the adversarial setting in experiments with real-world data. Guanyu Nie, Yididiya Y. Nadew, Yanhui Zhu, Vaneet Aggarwal, Christopher J. Quinn |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Size-constrained k-submodular maximization in near-linear timeabstractWe investigate the problems of maximizing k-submodular functions over total size constraints and over individual size constraints. k-submodularity is a generalization of submodularity beyond just picking items of a ground set, instead associating one of k types to chosen items. For sensor selection problems, for instance, this enables modeling of which type of sensor to put at a location, not simply whether to put a sensor or not. We propose and analyze threshold-greedy algorithms for both types of constraints. We prove that our proposed algorithms achieve the best known approximation ratios for both constraint types, up to a user-chosen parameter that balances computational complexity and the approximation ratio, while only using a number of function evaluations that depends linearly (up to poly-logarithmic terms) on the number of elements n, the number of types k, and the inverse of the user chosen parameter. Other algorithms that achieve the best-known deterministic approximation ratios require a number of function evaluations that depends linearly on the budget B, while our methods do not. We empirically demonstrate our algorithms’ performance in applications of sensor placement with k types and influence maximization with k topics. Guanyu Nie, Yanhui Zhu, Yididiya Y. Nadew, Samik Basu 0001, Aduri Pavan, Christopher J. Quinn |
UAI | 3 |