EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhigen Li
dblp:339/2545
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 23% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 23% Language models and text generation · 22% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
conversational agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ChatSOP: An SOP-Guided MCTS Planning Framework for Controllable LLM Dialogue Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ChatSOP: An SOP-Guided MCTS Planning Framework for Controllable LLM Dialogue Agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
adapter tuning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Adapt to Low-Resource Paraphrase Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
low-resource domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Adapt to Low-Resource Paraphrase Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
paraphrase generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Adapt to Low-Resource Paraphrase Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo tree search · 0.9SOP guidance · 0.9pre-trained language model · 0.6meta-learning · 0.6adapter · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ChatSOP: An SOP-Guided MCTS Planning Framework for Controllable LLM Dialogue AgentsabstractZhigen Li, Jianxiang Peng, Yanmeng Wang, Yong Cao, Tianhao Shen, Minghui Zhang, Linxi Su, Shang Wu, Yihang Wu, YuQian Wang, Ye Wang, Wei Hu, Jianfeng Li, Shaojun Wang, Jing Xiao, Deyi Xiong. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Zhigen Li, Jianxiang Peng, Yanmeng Wang, Tianhao Shen, Linxi Su, Yihang Wu, Jing Xiao 0006, Deyi Xiong |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2022 | A Cascade Dense Connection Fusion Network for Depth Completion
Rizhao Fan, Zhigen Li, Matteo Poggi, Stefano Mattoccia |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2022 | Learning to Adapt to Low-Resource Paraphrase GenerationabstractParaphrase generation is a longstanding NLP task and achieves great success with the aid of large corpora.However, transferring a paraphrasing model to another domain encounters the problem of domain shifting especially when the data is sparse.At the same time, widely using large pre-trained language models (PLMs) faces the overfitting problem when training on scarce labeled data.To mitigate these two issues, we propose, LAPA, an effective adapter for PLMs optimized by meta-learning.LAPA has three-stage training on three types of related resources to solve this problem: 1. pre-training PLMs on unsupervised corpora, 2. inserting an adapter layer and meta-training on source domain labeled data, and 3. fine-tuning adapters on a small amount of target domain labeled data.This method enables paraphrase generation models to learn basic language knowledge first, then learn the paraphrasing task itself later, and finally adapt to the target task.Our experimental results demonstrate that LAPA achieves state-of-the-art in supervised, unsupervised, and low-resource settings on three benchmark datasets.With only 2% of trainable parameters and 1% labeled data of the target task, our approach can achieve a competitive performance with previous work. Zhigen Li, Yanmeng Wang, Rizhao Fan |
EMNLP | 1 |