Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gangda Deng
dblp:339/3927
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6827-0256ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 67% Debugging and program repair · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code agent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LocAgent: Graph-Guided LLM Agents for Code Localization · ACL (1) 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LocAgent: Graph-Guided LLM Agents for Code Localization · ACL (1) 2025 |
Debugging and program repair
code localization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LocAgent: Graph-Guided LLM Agents for Code Localization · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LocAgent: Graph-Guided LLM Agents for Code LocalizationabstractZhaoling Chen, Robert Tang, Gangda Deng, Fang Wu, Jialong Wu, Zhiwei Jiang, Viktor Prasanna, Arman Cohan, Xingyao Wang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Zhaoling Chen, Robert Tang, Gangda Deng, Fang Wu 0002, Jialong Wu 0010, Viktor Prasanna 0001, Arman Cohan, Xingyao Wang 0002 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | Mixture of Scope Experts at Test: Generalizing Deeper Graph Neural Networks with Shallow VariantsabstractHeterophilous graphs, where dissimilar nodes tend to connect, pose a challenge for graph neural networks (GNNs). Increasing the GNN depth can expand the scope (i.e., receptive field), potentially finding homophily from the higher-order neighborhoods. However, GNNs suffer from performance degradation as depth increases. Despite having better expressivity, state-of-the-art deeper GNNs achieve only marginal improvements compared to their shallow variants. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we systematically demonstrate a shift in GNN generalization preferences across nodes with different homophily levels as depth increases. This creates a disparity in generalization patterns between GNN models with varying depth. Based on these findings, we propose to improve deeper GNN generalization while maintaining high expressivity by Mixture of scope experts at test (Moscat). Experimental results show that Moscat works flexibly with various GNN architectures across a wide range of datasets while significantly improving accuracy. Gangda Deng, Rajgopal Kannan, Viktor Prasanna 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | AP Selection in Uplink Cell-Free Massive MIMO: An Unsupervised Heterogeneous GNN ApproachabstractWe examine an uplink cell-free (CF) massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system in which multiple-antenna access points (APs) are connected to a central processing unit (CPU) via unlimited capacity front-haul links, and each user equipment (UE) is equipped with a single antenna. In such a system, optimizing AP selection to maximize the sum spectral efficiency (SE) while meeting real-time communication requirements is challenging. To address this, we develop a novel approach using a heterogeneous graph neural network (HetGNN), which effectively captures the complex relationships between AP and UE nodes. Given the difficulty in obtaining ground truth for optimal AP selection, we employ an unsupervised HetGNN model that directly optimizes AP selection through its loss function. Simulation results demonstrate that our approach achieves an average improvement of at least 8% compared to existing methods and surpasses an offline approach using the Simulated Annealing method. Our approach also results in high fairness scores on Jain's Fairness Index; averaging greater than 0.845 per UE and exceeding 0.9 as the system scales. Our computation time analysis shows that the average inference time remains low and within acceptable limits for communication systems. Gangda Deng, Cauligi S. Raghavendra, Rajgopal Kannan, Ananthram Swami, Viktor Prasanna 0001 |
WCNC | 2 |
| 2024 | A Unified CPU-GPU Protocol for GNN TrainingabstractTraining a Graph Neural Network (GNN) model on large-scale graphs involves a high volume of data communication and computations. While state-of-the-art CPUs and GPUs feature high computing power, the Standard GNN training protocol adopted in existing GNN frameworks cannot efficiently utilize the platform resources. To this end, we propose a novel Unified CPU-GPU protocol that can improve the resource utilization of GNN training on a CPU-GPU platform. The Unified CPU-GPU protocol instantiates multiple GNN training processes in parallel on both the CPU and the GPU. By allocating training processes on the CPU to perform GNN training collaboratively with the GPU, the proposed protocol improves the platform resource utilization and reduces the CPU-GPU data transfer overhead. Since the performance of a CPU and a GPU varies, we develop a novel load balancer that balances the workload dynamically between CPUs and GPUs during runtime. We evaluate our protocol using two representative GNN sampling algorithms, with two widely-used GNN models, on three datasets. Compared with the Standard training protocol adopted in the state-of-the-art GNN frameworks, our protocol effectively improves resource utilization and improves the overall training time. On a platform where the GPU moderately outperforms the CPU, our protocol speeds up GNN training by up to 1.41×. On a platform where the GPU significantly outperforms the CPU, our protocol speeds up GNN training by up to 1.26×. Our protocol is open-sourced and can be seamlessly integrated into state-of-the-art GNN frameworks and accelerate GNN training. Our protocol particularly benefits those with limited GPU access due to its high demand. Yi-Chien Lin, Gangda Deng, Viktor Prasanna 0001 |
CF | 2 |
| 2024 | TASER: Temporal Adaptive Sampling for Fast and Accurate Dynamic Graph Representation LearningabstractRecently, Temporal Graph Neural Networks (TGNNs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in various high-impact applications, including fraud detection and content recommendation. Despite the success of TGNNs, they are prone to the prevalent noise found in real-world dynamic graphs like time-deprecated links and skewed interaction distribution. The noise causes two critical issues that significantly compromise the accuracy of TGNNs: (1) models are supervised by inferior interactions, and (2) noisy input induces high variance in the aggregated messages. However, current TGNN denoising techniques do not consider the diverse and dynamic noise pattern of each node. In addition, they also suffer from the excessive mini-batch generation overheads caused by traversing more neighbors. We believe the remedy for fast and accurate TGNNs lies in temporal adaptive sampling. In this work, we propose TASER, the first adaptive sampling method for TGNNs optimized for accuracy, efficiency, and scalability. TASER adapts its mini-batch selection based on training dynamics and temporal neighbor selection based on the contextual, structural, and temporal properties of past interactions. To alleviate the bottleneck in mini-batch generation, TASER implements a pure GPU-based temporal neighbor finder and a dedicated GPU feature cache. We evaluate the performance of TASER using two state-of-the-art backbone TGNNs. On five popular datasets, TASER outperforms the corresponding baselines by an average of 2.3% in Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) while achieving an average of 5.1× speedup in training time. Gangda Deng, Hanqing Zeng, Yinglong Xia, Christopher Leung, Rajgopal Kannan, Viktor Prasanna 0001 |
IPDPS | 1 |
| 2023 | PairGNNs: enabling graph neural networks with pair-based view
Chenhuan Yu, Gangda Deng, Ning Gui |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 2 |