Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bryan Zhang

dblp:339/6428 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 77% Computational science and engineering · 23%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
0.912025
DiffCAM: Data-Driven Saliency Maps by Capturing Feature Differences · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
DiffCAM: Data-Driven Saliency Maps by Capturing Feature Differences · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map
0.912025
DiffCAM: Data-Driven Saliency Maps by Capturing Feature Differences · CVPR 2025
Computing education › STEM education
engineering design education
0.912025
Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
class activation map
0.312025
DiffCAM: Data-Driven Saliency Maps by Capturing Feature Differences · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation-based evaluation · 1.7feature difference · 0.9class activation map · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LocRegen: Cost-Efficient Redundancy Removal in Multilingual E-commerce Titles with Small Language Models
abstract
E-commerce product titles often include redundant information that negatively impacts the user experience. Removing repeated words through restructuring and paraphrasing can make titles more concise and improve readability. While large language models can optimize titles, their computational cost makes them impractical for large-scale applications. In this paper, we first analyze the sources of repetition in multilingual product titles, then present LocRegen, a system that uses smaller language models to efficiently remove redundancies while preserving essential product attributes. Our experiments across five languages show that LocRegen with a 7B model substantially outperforms a 47B mixture-of-experts model: LocRegen achieves a 2.4% redundant title rate compared to 3.5% for the 47B model, and maintains a 3.8% overall error rate across all error categories including key product attribute omission compared to 8.4% for the 47B model. These results demonstrate that LocRegen delivers superior performance on cost-effective hardware with acceptable latency, making it practical for large-scale deployment where much larger models would be computationally prohibitive.
Bryan Zhang, Stephan Walter, Luca Lomanto, Merve Arinik
EAMT (1)1
2026 CatalogAgent: A Supervisor-Mediated Self-Learning System Enabling Context Engineering for GenAI Models
Zhu Cheng, Zhenming Wang, Bryan Zhang, Athanasios N. Nikolakopoulos, Pranav Souri Itabada, Chih-Chi Chou, Fatemeh Mansoori, Bharat Bojja, Sarath Chander, Sameer Thombare, Aziz Umit Batur, Tarik Arici
KSEM (1)5
2025 DiffCAM: Data-Driven Saliency Maps by Capturing Feature Differences
abstract
In recent years, the interpretability of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has garnered significant attention, particularly due to their widespread deployment in critical domains like healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems. To address the challenge of understanding how DNNs make decisions, Explainable AI (XAI) methods, such as saliency maps, have been developed to provide insights into the inner workings of these models. This paper introduces DiffCAM, a novel XAI method designed to overcome limitations in existing Class Activation Map (CAM)-based techniques, which often rely on decision boundary gradients to estimate feature importance. DiffCAM differentiates itself by considering the actual data distribution of the reference class, identifying feature importance based on how a target example differs from reference examples. This approach captures the most discriminative features without relying on decision boundaries or prediction results, making DiffCAM applicable to a broader range of models, including foundation models. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the superior performance and flexibility of DiffCAM in providing meaningful explanations across diverse datasets and scenarios.
Xingjian Li 0002, Qiming Zhao, Neelesh Bisht, Mostofa Rafid Uddin, Jin Yu Kim, Bryan Zhang, Min Xu 0009
CVPR6
2025 Toward Engineering AGI: Benchmarking the Engineering Design Capabilities of LLMs
abstract
Modern engineering, spanning electrical, mechanical, aerospace, civil, and computer disciplines, stands as a cornerstone of human civilization and the foundation of our society. However, engineering design poses a fundamentally different challenge for large language models (LLMs) compared with traditional textbook-style problem solving or factual question answering. Although existing benchmarks have driven progress in areas such as language understanding, code synthesis, and scientific problem solving, real-world engineering design demands the synthesis of domain knowledge, navigation of complex trade-offs, and management of the tedious processes that consume much of practicing engineers' time. Despite these shared challenges across engineering disciplines, no benchmark currently captures the unique demands of engineering design work. In this work, we introduce EngDesign, an Engineering Design benchmark that evaluates LLMs' abilities to perform practical design tasks across nine engineering domains. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on factual recall or question answering, EngDesign uniquely emphasizes LLMs' ability to synthesize domain knowledge, reason under constraints, and generate functional, objective-oriented engineering designs. Each task in EngDesign represents a real-world engineering design problem, accompanied by a detailed task description specifying design goals, constraints, and performance requirements. EngDesign pioneers a simulation-based evaluation paradigm that moves beyond textbook knowledge to assess genuine engineering design capabilities and shifts evaluation from static answer checking to dynamic, simulation-driven functional verification, marking a crucial step toward realizing the vision of engineering Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
Xingang Guo, Xiangyi Kong, Yilan Jiang, Xiayu Zhao, Zhihua Gong, Daixuan Li, Tianle Sang, Beixiao Zhu, Gregory Jun, Yingbing Huang, Yuqi Xue, Rahul Dev Kundu, Qi Jian Lim, Luke Alexander Granger, Mohamed Badr Younis, Darioush Keivan, Nippun Sabharwal, Shreyanka Sinha, Prakhar Agarwal, Kojo Vandyck, Hanlin Mai, Aditya Venkatesh, Ayush Barik, Jiankun Yang, Chongying Yue, Jingjie He, Licheng Xu, Liujun Xu, Rushabh Shetty, Ziheng Guo, Dahui Song, Manvi Jha, Weijie Liang, Weiman Yan, Bryan Zhang, Sahil Bhandary Karnoor, Rutva Pandya, Xinyi Gong, Mithesh Ballae Ganesh, Feize Shi, Ruiling Xu, Yanfeng Ouyang, Lianhui Qin, Elyse Rosenbaum, Corey Snyder, Peter J. Seiler, Geir E. Dullerud, Xiaojia Shelly Zhang, Zuofu Cheng, Pavan Kumar Hanumolu, Mayank Kulkarni, Mahdi Namazifar, Bin Hu 0002
NeurIPS43