Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martina Rossini
dblp:339/6430
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6762-5038ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 67% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
smart contract vulnerability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Smart Contracts Vulnerability Classification through Deep Learning · SenSys 2022 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
vulnerability classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Smart Contracts Vulnerability Classification through Deep Learning · SenSys 2022 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Smart Contracts Vulnerability Classification through Deep Learning · SenSys 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 0.6LSTM · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Techniques for Smart Contract Vulnerability ClassificationabstractSmart contracts are self-executing digital contracts that run on a blockchain network. They enable the automation and decentralization of various operations and have become increasingly popular in recent years. However, smart contracts are susceptible to vulnerabilities, and their deployment without proper security testing can result in severe consequences, such as financial losses and reputational damage. In this article, we explore the use of deep learning techniques, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), for detecting and classifying vulnerabilities in smart contracts deployed on the Ethereum main net. We compare different kinds of neural architectures, i.e., a baseline LSTM, multiple 1D CNNs working on the smart contracts’ bytecode, a Vision Transformer (Swin v2 Tiny), and various 2D CNNs that work on RGB images obtained from the bytecode (i.e., ResNet-50, ResNeXt-50, Inception v3, and EfficientNetv2 Small). We provide an in-depth analysis of these techniques to classify a dataset of smart contracts we have collected. Our study shows that the use of deep neural networks can represent a promising technique to automatically assess smart contracts’ correctness and classify potential vulnerabilities. According to our experiments, the ResNet 1D CNN working directly on the smart contract bytecode offers the best results in terms of classification capabilities. Moreover, due to the unbalanced sizes of the different classes, the classification resulted in more effectiveness for the unchecked calls and reentrancy vulnerability classes while still providing good results for others. Martina Rossini, Stefano Ferretti |
Distributed Ledger Technol. Res. Pract. | 1 |
| 2022 | Smart Contracts Vulnerability Classification through Deep LearningabstractWe investigate the use of deep learning to classify smart contract code vulnerabilities. We use different variants of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network. Five classes of vulnerabilities were employed. Our results suggest that the CNNs are able to provide a good level of accuracy, thus showing the viability of the proposed approach. Martina Rossini, Mirko Zichichi, Stefano Ferretti |
SenSys | 1 |