Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Asaf Rotenberg
dblp:339/7177
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 50% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 25% Computational complexity · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory › statistical inference › detection and estimation
detection thresholds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Planted Bipartite Graph Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Information theory
hypothesis testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Planted Bipartite Graph Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › dense subgraph discovery
planted subgraph detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Planted Bipartite Graph Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Computational complexity
statistical-computational gaps |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Planted Bipartite Graph Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
low-degree polynomial algorithms · 0.8information-theoretic lower bound · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Planted Bipartite Graph DetectionabstractWe consider the task of detecting a hidden bipartite subgraph in a given random graph. This is formulated as a hypothesis testing problem, under the null hypothesis, the graph is a realization of an Erdős-Rényi random graph over n vertices with edge density q. Under the alternative, there exists a planted$k_{ \mathsf {R}} \times k_{ \mathsf {L}}$bipartite subgraph with edge density$p>q$. We characterize the statistical and computational barriers for this problem. Specifically, we derive information-theoretic lower bounds, and design and analyze optimal algorithms matching those bounds, in both the dense regime, where$p,q = \Theta \left ({1}\right)$, and the sparse regime where$p,q = \Theta \left ({n^{-\alpha }}\right), \alpha \in \left ({0,2}\right]$. We also consider the problem of testing in polynomial-time. As is customary in similar structured high-dimensional problems, our model undergoes an “easy-hard-impossible” phase transition and computational constraints penalize the statistical performance. To provide an evidence for this statistical computational gap, we prove computational lower bounds based on the low-degree conjecture, and show that the class of low-degree polynomials algorithms fail in the conjecturally hard region. Asaf Rotenberg, Wasim Huleihel, Ofer Shayevitz |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2023 | Detecting a Planted Bipartite GraphabstractWe consider the task of detecting a hidden bipartite subgraph in a given random graph. Specifically, under the null hypothesis, the graph is a realization of an Erdős-Rényi random graph over n vertices with edge density q. Under the alternative, there exists a planted kR× kLbipartite subgraph with edge density p > q. We derive asymptotically tight upper and lower bounds for this detection problem in both the dense regime, where q, p = Θ(1), and the sparse regime where q, p = Θ(n−α), α ∈ (0, 2]. Moreover, we consider a variant of the above problem, where one can only observe a relatively small part of the graph, by using at most Q edge queries. For this problem, we derive upper and lower bounds in both the dense and sparse regimes, and observe a gap between them. Asaf Rotenberg, Wasim Huleihel, Ofer Shayevitz |
ISIT | 1 |