Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marc Andrew Choi

dblp:339/7601 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery
0.912025
Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
0.912025
Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD · Bioinform. 2025
Medical and health informatics
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9large language model · 0.9agentic system · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD
abstract
MOTIVATION: Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with research tools presents technical and reproducibility challenges for biomedical research. While commercial artificial intelligence (AI) systems are easy to adopt, they obscure data provenance, lack transparency, and can generates false information, making them unfit for many research problems. To address these challenges, we developed the Bioinformatics Retrieval Augmented Digital (BRAD) agent software system. RESULTS: Here, we introduce BRAD, an agentic system that integrates LLMs with external tools and data to streamline research workflows. BRAD's modular agents retrieve information from literature, custom software, and online databases while maintaining transparent protocols to increase the reliability of AI generated results. We apply BRAD to a biomarker discovery pipeline, automating both execution and the generation of enrichment reports. This workflow contextualizes user data within the literature, enabling a level of interpretation and automation that surpasses conventional research tools. Beyond the workflow we highlight here, BRAD is a flexible system that has been deployed in other applications including a chatbot, video RAG, and analysis of single cell data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for BRAD is available at https://github.com/Jpickard1/BRAD; Information for pip installation, tutorials, documentation, and further information can be found at: ReadTheDocs.
Joshua Pickard, Ram Prakash, Marc Andrew Choi, Natalie Oliven, Cooper Stansbury, Jillian Cwycyshyn, Nicholas Galioto, Alex A. Gorodetsky, Alvaro Velasquez, Indika Rajapakse
Bioinform.3
2022 Combining Dynamic Mode Decomposition and Difference-in-Differences in an Analysis of At-Risk Youth
abstract
We analyze the impact of the Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) prevention programming using quasi-experimental data. We model the evolution of questionnaire scores and apply Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) to describe the asymptotic behavior of the dynamical system. The analysis indicates that risk decreased for youth who enrolled in GRYD prevention services, while it increased or remained the same for those who were in the control group. We augment these observations using a difference-in-differences (DID) model, showing that the decrease in risk can be attributed to enrolment in prevention services. We draw a connection between DMD and DID using both mathematical analysis and empirical evidence from the questionnaire data. Combining DMD and DID with factor analysis, we investigate the effectiveness of prevention services with respect to different attitudinal domains. We conclude that gang prevention is most effective in impacting attitudes towards negative peer obedience and least effective in impacting attitudes towards violence for self defense. Our analytical approach can be extended to other types of repeated questionnaires.
Marc Andrew Choi, Siyu Huang, Hengyuan Qi, Marco Scialanga, Emerson McMullen, Axel Sanchez Moreno, Yifei Lou, Andrea L. Bertozzi, P. Jeffrey Brantingham
IEEE Big Data1