Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Grigory Bartosh
dblp:339/8652
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Generative modeling · 77% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% Graph learning · 5% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
4.7 | 6 | 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential Equations · ICML 2025 TEncDM: Understanding the Properties of the Diffusion Model in the Space of Language Model Encodings · AAAI 2025 Equivariant Neural Diffusion for Molecule Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential Equations · ICML 2025 Variational Flow Matching for Graph Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model training
simulation-free training |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential Equations · ICML 2025 Neural Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › discrete diffusion model
diffusion language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TEncDM: Understanding the Properties of the Diffusion Model in the Space of Language Model Encodings · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › continuous-time model › stochastic differential equations
latent stochastic differential equation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential Equations · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential Equations · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
equivariant diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Equivariant Neural Diffusion for Molecule Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Flow Matching for Graph Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Equivariant Neural Diffusion for Molecule Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
nonlinear diffusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › score-based generative model
denoising diffusion probabilistic model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Star-Shaped Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
conditional text generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | TEncDM: Understanding the Properties of the Diffusion Model in the Space of Language Model Encodings · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential Equations · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Flow Matching for Graph Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
exponential family |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Star-Shaped Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 1.6variational inference · 1.5transformer decoder · 0.9self-conditioning · 0.9score matching · 0.9noise scheduler · 0.9flow matching · 0.9adjoint sensitivity · 0.9SDE solver · 0.8ODE solver · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TEncDM: Understanding the Properties of the Diffusion Model in the Space of Language Model EncodingsabstractThis paper presents the Text Encoding Diffusion Model (TEncDM), a novel approach to diffusion modeling that operates in the space of pre-trained language model encodings. In contrast to traditionally used embeddings, encodings integrate contextual information. In our approach, we also employ a transformer-based decoder, specifically designed to incorporate context in the token prediction process. We conduct a comprehensive examination of the influence of the encoder, decoder, noise scheduler, and self-conditioning on zero-shot generation. Furthermore, we compare TEncDM with previous approaches on three conditional text generation tasks: QQP, XSum, and Wiki-Auto. The results show that TEncDM exhibits superior performance compared to existing non-autoregressive diffusion models. Alexander Shabalin, Viacheslav Meshchaninov, Egor Chimbulatov, Vladislav Lapikov, Roman Kim, Grigory Bartosh, Dmitry Molchanov, Sergey Markov, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
AAAI | 6 |
| 2025 | SDE Matching: Scalable and Simulation-Free Training of Latent Stochastic Differential EquationsabstractThe Latent Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) is a powerful tool for time series and sequence modeling. However, training Latent SDEs typically relies on adjoint sensitivity methods, which depend on simulation and backpropagation through approximate SDE solutions, which limit scalability. In this work, we propose SDE Matching, a new simulation-free method for training Latent SDEs. Inspired by modern Score- and Flow Matching algorithms for learning generative dynamics, we extend these ideas to the domain of stochastic dynamics for time series modeling, eliminating the need for costly numerical simulations. Our results demonstrate that SDE Matching achieves performance comparable to adjoint sensitivity methods while drastically reducing computational complexity. Grigory Bartosh, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Christian A. Naesseth |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Neural Diffusion ModelsabstractDiffusion models have shown remarkable performance on many generative tasks. Despite recent success, most diffusion models are restricted in that they only allow linear transformation of the data distribution. In contrast, broader family of transformations can help train generative distributions more efficiently, simplifying the reverse process and closing the gap between the true negative log-likelihood and the variational approximation. In this paper, we present Neural Diffusion Models (NDMs), a generalization of conventional diffusion models that enables defining and learning time-dependent non-linear transformations of data. We show how to optimise NDMs using a variational bound in a simulation-free setting. Moreover, we derive a time-continuous formulation of NDMs, which allows fast and reliable inference using off-the-shelf numerical ODE and SDE solvers. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of NDMs through experiments on many image generation benchmarks, including MNIST, CIFAR-10, downsampled versions of ImageNet and CelebA-HQ. NDMs outperform conventional diffusion models in terms of likelihood, achieving state-of-the-art results on ImageNet and CelebA-HQ, and produces high-quality samples. Grigory Bartosh, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Christian A. Naesseth |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Neural Flow Diffusion Models: Learnable Forward Process for Improved Diffusion ModellingabstractConventional diffusion models typically relies on a fixed forward process, which implicitly defines complex marginal distributions over latent variables. This can often complicate the reverse process’ task in learning generative trajectories, and results in costly inference for diffusion models. To address these limitations, we introduce Neural Flow Diffusion Models (NFDM), a novel framework that enhances diffusion models by supporting a broader range of forward processes beyond the standard Gaussian. We also propose a novel parameterization technique for learning the forward process. Our framework provides an end-to-end, simulation-free optimization objective, effectively minimizing a variational upper bound on the negative log-likelihood. Experimental results demonstrate NFDM’s strong performance, evidenced by state-of-the-art likelihood estimation. Furthermore, we investigate NFDM’s capacity for learning generative dynamics with specific characteristics, such as deterministic straight lines trajectories, and demonstrate how the framework may be adopted for learning bridges between two distributions. The results underscores NFDM’s versatility and its potential for a wide range of applications. Grigory Bartosh, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Christian A. Naesseth |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Equivariant Neural Diffusion for Molecule GenerationabstractWe introduce Equivariant Neural Diffusion (END), a novel diffusion model for molecule generation in 3D that is equivariant to Euclidean transformations. Compared to current state-of-the-art equivariant diffusion models, the key innovation in END lies in its learnable forward process for enhanced generative modelling. Rather than pre-specified, the forward process is parameterized through a time- and data-dependent transformation that is equivariant to rigid transformations. Through a series of experiments on standard molecule generation benchmarks, we demonstrate the competitive performance of END compared to several strong baselines for both unconditional and conditional generation. François R. J. Cornet, Grigory Bartosh, Mikkel N. Schmidt, Christian A. Naesseth |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Variational Flow Matching for Graph GenerationabstractWe present a formulation of flow matching as variational inference, which we refer to as variational flow matching (VFM). We use this formulation to develop CatFlow, a flow matching method for categorical data that is easy to implement, computationally efficient, and achieves strong results on graph generation tasks. In VFM, the objective is to approximate the posterior probability path, which is a distribution over possible end points of a trajectory. VFM admits both the original flow matching objective and the CatFlow objective as special cases. We also relate VFM to score-based models, in which the dynamics are stochastic rather than deterministic, and derive a bound on the model likelihood based on a reweighted VFM objective. We evaluate CatFlow on one abstract graph generation task and two molecular generation tasks. In all cases, CatFlow exceeds or matches performance of the current state-of-the-art models. Floor Eijkelboom, Grigory Bartosh, Christian A. Naesseth, Max Welling, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Star-Shaped Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsabstractDenoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) provide the foundation for the recent breakthroughs in generative modeling.
Their Markovian structure makes it difficult to define DDPMs with distributions other than Gaussian or discrete.
In this paper, we introduce Star-Shaped DDPM (SS-DDPM).
Its *star-shaped diffusion process* allows us to bypass the need to define the transition probabilities or compute posteriors.
We establish duality between star-shaped and specific Markovian diffusions for the exponential family of distributions and derive efficient algorithms for training and sampling from SS-DDPMs.
In the case of Gaussian distributions, SS-DDPM is equivalent to DDPM.
However, SS-DDPMs provide a simple recipe for designing diffusion models with distributions such as Beta, von Mises–Fisher, Dirichlet, Wishart and others, which can be especially useful when data lies on a constrained manifold.
We evaluate the model in different settings and find it competitive even on image data, where Beta SS-DDPM achieves results comparable to a Gaussian DDPM.
Our implementation is available at https://github.com/andrey-okhotin/star-shaped Andrey Okhotin, Dmitry Molchanov, Vladimir Arkhipkin, Grigory Bartosh, Viktor Ohanesian, Aibek Alanov, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NeurIPS | 4 |