EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Louis Grenioux
dblp:339/8821
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Generative modeling · 36% Robot navigation and mapping · 12% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampler for multi-modal distributions · ICLR 2025 Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampler for multi-modal distributions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampler for multi-modal distributions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
multimodal sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampler for multi-modal distributions · ICLR 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
probabilistic localization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Sampling with Approximate Transport Maps · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | On Sampling with Approximate Transport Maps · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain monte carlo · 1.4score-based diffusion · 0.9reference diffusion model · 0.9score-based learning · 0.8denoising · 0.8normalizing flow · 0.7metropolis-hastings · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampler for multi-modal distributionsabstractOver the past few years, several approaches utilizing score-based diffusion have been proposed to sample from probability distributions, that is without having access to exact samples and relying solely on evaluations of unnormalized densities. The resulting samplers approximate the time-reversal of a noising diffusion process, bridging the target distribution to an easy-to-sample base distribution. In practice, the performance of these methods heavily depends on key hyperparameters that require ground truth samples to be accurately tuned. Our work aims to highlight and address this fundamental issue, focusing in particular on multi-modal distributions, which pose significant challenges for existing sampling methods. Building on existing approaches, we introduce *Learned Reference-based Diffusion Sampler* (LRDS), a methodology specifically designed to leverage prior knowledge on the location of the target modes in order to bypass the obstacle of hyperparameter tuning. LRDS proceeds in two steps by (i) learning a *reference* diffusion model on samples located in high-density space regions and tailored for multimodality, and (ii) using this reference model to foster the training of a diffusion-based sampler. We experimentally demonstrate that LRDS best exploits prior knowledge on the target distribution compared to competing algorithms on a variety of challenging distributions. Maxence Noble, Louis Grenioux, Marylou Gabrié, Alain Durmus |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior SamplingabstractBuilding upon score-based learning, new interest in stochastic localization techniques has recently emerged. In these models, one seeks to noise a sample from the data distribution through a stochastic process, called observation process, and progressively learns a denoiser associated to this dynamics. Apart from specific applications, the use of stochastic localization for the problem of sampling from an unnormalized target density has not been explored extensively. This work contributes to fill this gap. We consider a general stochastic localization framework and introduce an explicit class of observation processes, associated with flexible denoising schedules. We provide a complete methodology, *Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior Sampling* (**SLIPS**), to obtain approximate samples of these dynamics, and as a by-product, samples from the target distribution. Our scheme is based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of the denoiser and comes with detailed practical guidelines. We illustrate the benefits and applicability of **SLIPS** on several benchmarks of multi-modal distributions, including Gaussian mixtures in increasing dimensions, Bayesian logistic regression and a high-dimensional field system from statistical-mechanics. Louis Grenioux, Maxence Noble, Marylou Gabrié, Alain Durmus |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | On Sampling with Approximate Transport MapsabstractTransport maps can ease the sampling of distributions with non-trivial geometries by transforming them into distributions that are easier to handle. The potential of this approach has risen with the development of Normalizing Flows (NF) which are maps parameterized with deep neural networks trained to push a reference distribution towards a target. NF-enhanced samplers recently proposed blend (Markov chain) Monte Carlo methods with either (i) proposal draws from the flow or (ii) a flow-based reparametrization. In both cases, the quality of the learned transport conditions performance. The present work clarifies for the first time the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches. Our study concludes that multimodal targets can be reliably handled with flow-based proposals up to moderately high dimensions. In contrast, methods relying on reparametrization struggle with multimodality but are more robust otherwise in high-dimensional settings and under poor training. To further illustrate the influence of target-proposal adequacy, we also derive a new quantitative bound for the mixing time of the Independent Metropolis-Hastings sampler. Louis Grenioux, Alain Durmus, Eric Moulines, Marylou Gabrié |
ICML | 1 |