EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Y. Jennifer Sun
dblp:339/8871
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 34% Learning theory · 28% Optimization for machine learning · 26% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 89% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 11% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Sparsity-Based Interpolation of External, Internal and Swap Regret · COLT 2025 Partial Matrix Completion · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
bandit convex optimization |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Second Order Methods for Bandit Optimization and Control · COLT 2024 Optimal Rates for Bandit Nonstochastic Control · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Second Order Methods for Bandit Optimization and Control · COLT 2024 Sketchy: Memory-efficient Adaptive Regularization with Frequent Directions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sparsity-Based Interpolation of External, Internal and Swap Regret · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
non-stochastic control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tight Rates for Bandit Control Beyond Quadratics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
online control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Control in Population Dynamics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Control in Population Dynamics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
bandit convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tight Rates for Bandit Control Beyond Quadratics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
online optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tight Rates for Bandit Control Beyond Quadratics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
adaptive regularization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sketchy: Memory-efficient Adaptive Regularization with Frequent Directions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandit learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Rates for Bandit Nonstochastic Control · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
matrix completion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Partial Matrix Completion · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sketchy: Memory-efficient Adaptive Regularization with Frequent Directions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics › ecology
population dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Online Control in Population Dynamics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Tight Rates for Bandit Control Beyond Quadratics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
linear quadratic regulator |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Rates for Bandit Nonstochastic Control · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimal Rates for Bandit Nonstochastic Control · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reduction to bandit convex optimization · 1.5online control · 1.5gradient-based control · 1.5gradient estimator · 1.5haar wavelet features · 0.9comparator-adaptive online learning · 0.9online newton step · 0.8linear dynamical systems · 0.8linear dynamical system · 0.8regret analysis · 0.7kronecker-factored approximation · 0.7frequent directions · 0.7bandit convex optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sparsity-Based Interpolation of External, Internal and Swap RegretabstractFocusing on the expert problem in online learning, this paper studies the interpolation of several performance metrics via $\phi$-regret minimization, which measures the total loss of an algorithm by its regret with respect to an arbitrary action modification rule $\phi$. With $d$ experts and $T\gg d$ rounds in total, we present a single algorithm achieving the instance-adaptive $\phi$-regret bound $ \tilde O\left\{\min\left\{\sqrt{d-d^{\mathrm{unif}}_\phi+1},\sqrt{d-d^{\mathrm{self}}_\phi}\right\}\cdot\sqrt{T}\right\}, $ where $d^{\mathrm{unif}}_\phi$ is the maximum amount of experts modified identically by $\phi$, and $d^{\mathrm{self}}_\phi$ is the amount of experts that $\phi$ trivially modifies to themselves. By recovering the optimal $O(\sqrt{T\log d})$ external regret bound when $d^{\mathrm{unif}}_\phi=d$, the standard $\tilde O(\sqrt{T})$ internal regret bound when $d^{\mathrm{self}}_\phi=d-1$ and the optimal $\tilde O(\sqrt{dT})$ swap regret bound in the worst case, we improve upon existing algorithms in the intermediate regimes. In addition, the computational complexity of our algorithm matches that of the standard swap-regret minimization algorithm due to Blum and Mansour (2007). Technically, building on the well-known reduction from $\phi$-regret minimization to external regret minimization on stochastic matrices, our main idea is to further convert the latter to online linear regression using Haar-wavelet-inspired matrix features. Then, by associating the complexity of each $\phi$ instance with its sparsity under the feature representation, we apply techniques from comparator-adaptive online learning to exploit the sparsity in this regression subroutine. Y. Jennifer Sun |
COLT | 2 |
| 2024 | Second Order Methods for Bandit Optimization and ControlabstractBandit convex optimization (BCO) is a general framework for online decision making under uncertainty. While tight regret bounds for general convex losses have been established, existing algorithms achieving these bounds have prohibitive computational costs for high dimensional data. In this paper, we propose a simple and practical BCO algorithm inspired by the online Newton step algorithm. We show that our algorithm achieves optimal (in terms of horizon) regret bounds for a large class of convex functions that satisfy a condition we call $\kappa$-convexity. This class contains a wide range of practically relevant loss functions including linear losses, quadratic losses, and generalized linear models. In addition to optimal regret, this method is the most efficient known algorithm for several well-studied applications including bandit logistic regression. Furthermore, we investigate the adaptation of our second-order bandit algorithm to online convex optimization with memory. We show that for loss functions with a certain affine structure, the extended algorithm attains optimal regret. This leads to an algorithm with optimal regret for bandit LQ problem under a fully adversarial noise model, thereby resolving an open question posed in Grade et. al. 2020 and Sun et. al. 2023. Finally, we show that the more general problem of BCO with (non-affine) memory is harder. We derive a $\tilde{\Omega}(T^{2/3})$ regret lower bound, even under the assumption of smooth and quadratic losses. Arun Suggala, Y. Jennifer Sun, Praneeth Netrapalli, Elad Hazan |
COLT | 2 |
| 2024 | Online Control in Population DynamicsabstractThe study of population dynamics originated with early sociological works but has since extended into many fields, including biology, epidemiology, evolutionary game theory, and economics. Most studies on population dynamics focus on the problem of prediction rather than control. Existing mathematical models for population control are often restricted to specific, noise-free dynamics, while real-world population changes can be complex and adversarial.
To address this gap, we propose a new framework based on the paradigm of online control. We first characterize a set of linear dynamical systems that can naturally model evolving populations. We then give an efficient gradient-based controller for these systems, with near-optimal regret bounds with respect to a broad class of linear policies. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for population control even in non-linear models such as SIR and replicator dynamics. Noah Golowich, Elad Hazan, Dhruv Rohatgi, Y. Jennifer Sun |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Tight Rates for Bandit Control Beyond QuadraticsabstractUnlike classical control theory, such as Linear Quadratic Control (LQC), real-world control problems are highly complex. These problems often involve adversarial perturbations, bandit feedback models, and non-quadratic, adversarially chosen cost functions. A fundamental yet unresolved question is whether optimal regret can be achieved for these general control problems. The standard approach to addressing this problem involves a reduction to bandit convex optimization with memory. In the bandit setting, constructing a gradient estimator with low variance is challenging due to the memory structure and non-quadratic loss functions.
In this paper, we provide an affirmative answer to this question. Our main contribution is an algorithm that achieves an $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ optimal regret for bandit non-stochastic control with strongly-convex and smooth cost functions in the presence of adversarial perturbations, improving the previously known $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret bound from \citep{cassel2020bandit}. Our algorithm overcomes the memory issue by reducing the problem to Bandit Convex Optimization (BCO) without memory and addresses general strongly-convex costs using recent advancements in BCO from \citep{suggala2024second}. Along the way, we develop an improved algorithm for BCO with memory, which may be of independent interest. Y. Jennifer Sun |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Sketchy: Memory-efficient Adaptive Regularization with Frequent DirectionsabstractAdaptive regularization methods that exploit more than the diagonal entries exhibit state of the art performance for many tasks, but can be prohibitive in terms of memory and running time. We find the spectra of the Kronecker-factored gradient covariance matrix in deep learning (DL) training tasks are concentrated on a small leading eigenspace that changes throughout training, motivating a low-rank sketching approach. We describe a generic method for reducing memory and compute requirements of maintaining a matrix preconditioner using the Frequent Directions (FD) sketch. While previous approaches have explored applying FD for second-order optimization, we present a novel analysis which allows efficient interpolation between resource requirements and the degradation in regret guarantees with rank $k$: in the online convex optimization (OCO) setting over dimension $d$, we match full-matrix $d^2$ memory regret using only $dk$ memory up to additive error in the bottom $d-k$ eigenvalues of the gradient covariance. Further, we show extensions of our work to Shampoo, resulting in a method competitive in quality with Shampoo and Adam, yet requiring only sub-linear memory for tracking second moments. Vladimir Feinberg, Xinyi Chen 0001, Y. Jennifer Sun, Rohan Anil, Elad Hazan |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Partial Matrix CompletionabstractThe matrix completion problem involves reconstructing a low-rank matrix by using a given set of revealed (and potentially noisy) entries. Although existing methods address the completion of the entire matrix, the accuracy of the completed entries can vary significantly across the matrix, due to differences in the sampling distribution. For instance, users may rate movies primarily from their country or favorite genres, leading to inaccurate predictions for the majority of completed entries.
We propose a novel formulation of the problem as Partial Matrix Completion, where the objective is to complete a substantial subset of the entries with high confidence. Our algorithm efficiently handles the unknown and arbitrarily complex nature of the sampling distribution, ensuring high accuracy for all completed entries and sufficient coverage across the matrix. Additionally, we introduce an online version of the problem and present a low-regret efficient algorithm based on iterative gradient updates. Finally, we conduct a preliminary empirical evaluation of our methods. Elad Hazan, Adam Tauman Kalai, Varun Kanade, Clara Mohri, Y. Jennifer Sun |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Optimal Rates for Bandit Nonstochastic ControlabstractLinear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control are foundational and extensively researched problems in optimal control. We investigate LQR and LQG problems with semi-adversarial perturbations and time-varying adversarial bandit loss functions. The best-known sublinear regret algorithm~\cite{gradu2020non} has a $T^{\frac{3}{4}}$ time horizon dependence, and its authors posed an open question about whether a tight rate of $\sqrt{T}$ could be achieved. We answer in the affirmative, giving an algorithm for bandit LQR and LQG which attains optimal regret, up to logarithmic factors. A central component of our method is a new scheme for bandit convex optimization with memory, which is of independent interest. Y. Jennifer Sun, Stephen H. Newman, Elad Hazan |
NeurIPS | 1 |