Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mikhail Khoroshikh

dblp:339/8916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 70% Efficient and distributed learning · 30%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion distillation
consistency distillation
0.812024
Invertible Consistency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion distillation
0.812024
Invertible Consistency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
Invertible Consistency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps · NeurIPS 2024
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
text-guided image editing
0.812024
Invertible Consistency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
model personalization
0.712023
Is This Loss Informative? Faster Text-to-Image Customization by Tracking Objective Dynamics · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.712023
Is This Loss Informative? Faster Text-to-Image Customization by Tracking Objective Dynamics · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion inversion
image inversion
0.212024
Invertible Consistency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic guidance · 1.5classifier-free guidance · 1.5training dynamics analysis · 0.7early stopping · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Invertible Consistency Distillation for Text-Guided Image Editing in Around 7 Steps
abstract
Diffusion distillation represents a highly promising direction for achieving faithful text-to-image generation in a few sampling steps. However, despite recent successes, existing distilled models still do not provide the full spectrum of diffusion abilities, such as real image inversion, which enables many precise image manipulation methods. This work aims to enrich distilled text-to-image diffusion models with the ability to effectively encode real images into their latent space. To this end, we introduce invertible Consistency Distillation (iCD), a generalized consistency distillation framework that facilitates both high-quality image synthesis and accurate image encoding in only 3-4 inference steps. Though the inversion problem for text-to-image diffusion models gets exacerbated by high classifier-free guidance scales, we notice that dynamic guidance significantly reduces reconstruction errors without noticeable degradation in generation performance. As a result, we demonstrate that iCD equipped with dynamic guidance may serve as a highly effective tool for zero-shot text-guided image editing, competing with more expensive state-of-the-art alternatives.
Nikita Starodubcev, Mikhail Khoroshikh, Artem Babenko, Dmitry Baranchuk
NeurIPS2
2023 Is This Loss Informative? Faster Text-to-Image Customization by Tracking Objective Dynamics
abstract
Text-to-image generation models represent the next step of evolution in image synthesis, offering a natural way to achieve flexible yet fine-grained control over the result. One emerging area of research is the fast adaptation of large text-to-image models to smaller datasets or new visual concepts. However, many efficient methods of adaptation have a long training time, which limits their practical applications, slows down experiments, and spends excessive GPU resources. In this work, we study the training dynamics of popular text-to-image personalization methods (such as Textual Inversion or DreamBooth), aiming to speed them up. We observe that most concepts are learned at early stages and do not improve in quality later, but standard training convergence metrics fail to indicate that. Instead, we propose a simple drop-in early stopping criterion that only requires computing the regular training objective on a fixed set of inputs for all training iterations. Our experiments on Stable Diffusion for 48 different concepts and three personalization methods demonstrate the competitive performance of our approach, which makes adaptation up to 8 times faster with no significant drops in quality.
Anton Voronov, Mikhail Khoroshikh, Artem Babenko, Max Ryabinin
NeurIPS2