EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Faraz Mirza
dblp:339/8946
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
hierarchical structure learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms · AAAI 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online learning · 1.3natarajan dimension · 1.3littlestone dimension · 1.3PAC learning · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and AlgorithmsabstractWe study the problem of learning a hierarchical tree representation of data from labeled samples, taken from an arbitrary (and possibly adversarial) distribution. Consider a collection of data tuples labeled according to their hierarchical structure. The smallest number of such tuples required in order to be able to accurately label subsequent tuples is of interest for data collection in machine learning. We present optimal sample complexity bounds for this problem in several learning settings, including (agnostic) PAC learning and online learning. Our results are based on tight bounds of the Natarajan and Littlestone dimensions of the associated problem. The corresponding tree classifiers can be constructed efficiently in near-linear time. Dmitrii Avdiukhin, Grigory Yaroslavtsev, Danny Vainstein, Orr Fischer, Sauman Das, Faraz Mirza |
AAAI | 6 |