Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Faraz Mirza

dblp:339/8946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
hierarchical structure learning
0.712023
Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.712023
Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms · AAAI 2023
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
hierarchical clustering
0.212023
Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online learning · 1.3natarajan dimension · 1.3littlestone dimension · 1.3PAC learning · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Tree Learning: Optimal Sample Complexity and Algorithms
abstract
We study the problem of learning a hierarchical tree representation of data from labeled samples, taken from an arbitrary (and possibly adversarial) distribution. Consider a collection of data tuples labeled according to their hierarchical structure. The smallest number of such tuples required in order to be able to accurately label subsequent tuples is of interest for data collection in machine learning. We present optimal sample complexity bounds for this problem in several learning settings, including (agnostic) PAC learning and online learning. Our results are based on tight bounds of the Natarajan and Littlestone dimensions of the associated problem. The corresponding tree classifiers can be constructed efficiently in near-linear time.
Dmitrii Avdiukhin, Grigory Yaroslavtsev, Danny Vainstein, Orr Fischer, Sauman Das, Faraz Mirza
AAAI6