EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bolei Deng
dblp:339/9005
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2589-2837ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational fabrication · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
differentiable simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Neural Constitutive Laws from Motion Observations for Generalizable PDE Dynamics · ICML 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Neural Constitutive Laws from Motion Observations for Generalizable PDE Dynamics · ICML 2023 |
Computational fabrication › material design
metamaterial design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Procedural Metamaterials: A Unified Procedural Graph for Metamaterial Design · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing
procedural modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Procedural Metamaterials: A Unified Procedural Graph for Metamaterial Design · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
triply periodic minimal surfaces · 0.7rotation equivariance · 0.7neural network · 0.7differentiable simulation · 0.7conjugate surface construction · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Learning Neural Constitutive Laws from Motion Observations for Generalizable PDE DynamicsabstractWe propose a hybrid neural network (NN) and PDE approach for learning generalizable PDE dynamics from motion observations. Many NN approaches learn an end-to-end model that implicitly models both the governing PDE and constitutive models (or material models). Without explicit PDE knowledge, these approaches cannot guarantee physical correctness and have limited generalizability. We argue that the governing PDEs are often well-known and should be explicitly enforced rather than learned. Instead, constitutive models are particularly suitable for learning due to their data-fitting nature. To this end, we introduce a new framework termed "Neural Constitutive Laws" (NCLaw), which utilizes a network architecture that strictly guarantees standard constitutive priors, including rotation equivariance and undeformed state equilibrium. We embed this network inside a differentiable simulation and train the model by minimizing a loss function based on the difference between the simulation and the motion observation. We validate NCLaw on various large-deformation dynamical systems, ranging from solids to fluids. After training on a single motion trajectory, our method generalizes to new geometries, initial/boundary conditions, temporal ranges, and even multi-physics systems. On these extremely out-of-distribution generalization tasks, NCLaw is orders-of-magnitude more accurate than previous NN approaches. Real-world experiments demonstrate our method’s ability to learn constitutive laws from videos. Pingchuan Ma 0002, Peter Yichen Chen, Bolei Deng, Josh Tenenbaum, Tao Du 0001, Chuang Gan 0001, Wojciech Matusik |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Procedural Metamaterials: A Unified Procedural Graph for Metamaterial DesignabstractWe introduce a compact, intuitive procedural graph representation for cellular metamaterials, which are small-scale, tileable structures that can be architected to exhibit many useful material properties. Because the structures’ “architectures” vary widely—with elements such as beams, thin shells, and solid bulks—it is difficult to explore them using existing representations. Generic approaches like voxel grids are versatile, but it is cumbersome to represent and edit individual structures; architecture-specific approaches address these issues, but are incompatible with one another. By contrast, our procedural graph succinctly represents the construction process for any structure using a simple skeleton annotated with spatially varying thickness. To express the highly constrained triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) in this manner, we present the first fully automated version of the conjugate surface construction method, which allows novices to create complex TPMS from intuitive input. We demonstrate our representation’s expressiveness, accuracy, and compactness by constructing a wide range of established structures and hundreds of novel structures with diverse architectures and material properties. We also conduct a user study to verify our representation’s ease-of-use and ability to expand engineers’ capacity for exploration. Liane Makatura, Yi-Lu Chen, Bolei Deng, Christopher Wojtan, Bernd Bickel, Wojciech Matusik |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 4 |