Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sarah Eve Kinsey
dblp:339/9077
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Optimization for machine learning · 28% Reinforcement learning · 28% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › differentiable optimization
optimization layer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond NaN: Resiliency of Optimization Layers in the Face of Infeasibility · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Building a Personalized Messaging System for Health Intervention in Underprivileged Regions Using Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond NaN: Resiliency of Optimization Layers in the Face of Infeasibility · AAAI 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
behavior modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Building a Personalized Messaging System for Health Intervention in Underprivileged Regions Using Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › planning for self-driving vehicles
velocity planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond NaN: Resiliency of Optimization Layers in the Face of Infeasibility · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.3neural network behavior model · 1.3condition number control · 0.7adversarial perturbation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Beyond NaN: Resiliency of Optimization Layers in the Face of InfeasibilityabstractPrior work has successfully incorporated optimization layers as the last layer in neural networks for various problems, thereby allowing joint learning and planning in one neural network forward pass. In this work, we identify a weakness in such a set-up where inputs to the optimization layer lead to undefined output of the neural network. Such undefined decision outputs can lead to possible catastrophic outcomes in critical real time applications. We show that an adversary can cause such failures by forcing rank deficiency on the matrix fed to the optimization layer which results in the optimization failing to produce a solution. We provide a defense for the failure cases by controlling the condition number of the input matrix. We study the problem in the settings of synthetic data, Jigsaw Sudoku, and in speed planning for autonomous driving. We show that our proposed defense effectively prevents the framework from failing with undefined output. Finally, we surface a number of edge cases which lead to serious bugs in popular optimization solvers which can be abused as well. Wai Tuck Wong, Sarah Eve Kinsey, Ramesha Karunasena, Thanh Hong Nguyen, Arunesh Sinha |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Building a Personalized Messaging System for Health Intervention in Underprivileged Regions Using Reinforcement LearningabstractThis work builds an effective AI-based message generation system for diabetes prevention in rural areas, where the diabetes rate has been increasing at an alarming rate. The messages contain information about diabetes causes and complications and the impact of nutrition and fitness on preventing diabetes. We propose to apply reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize our message selection policy over time, tailoring our messages to align with each individual participant's needs and preferences. We conduct an extensive field study in a large country in Asia which involves more than 1000 participants who are local villagers and they receive messages generated by our system, over a period of six months. Our analysis shows that with the use of AI, we can deliver significant improvements in the participants' diabetes-related knowledge, physical activity levels, and high-fat food avoidance, when compared to a static message set. Furthermore, we build a new neural network based behavior model to predict behavior changes of participants, trained on data collected during our study. By exploiting underlying characteristics of health-related behavior, we manage to significantly improve the prediction accuracy of our model compared to baselines. Sarah Eve Kinsey, Jack Wolf, Nalini Saligram, Varun Ramesan, Meeta Walavalkar, Nidhi Jaswal, Sandhya Ramalingam, Arunesh Sinha, Thanh Hong Nguyen |
IJCAI | 1 |