Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiancheng Wang 0001

dblp:34/10219-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-3532-3699ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Learning theory · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
dimensional collapse
1.012026
Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective · SIGIR 2026
Recommender systems › click-through rate prediction
feature interaction
1.012026
Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective · SIGIR 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
deep network analysis
0.312026
Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient-based analysis · 2.0ablation study · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective
abstract
DNNs have gained widespread adoption in feature interaction recommendation models. However, there has been a longstanding debate on their roles. On one hand, some works claim that DNNs possess the ability to implicitly capture high-order feature interactions. Conversely, recent studies have highlighted the limitations of DNNs in effectively learning dot products, specifically second-order interactions, let alone higher-order interactions. In this paper, we present a novel perspective to understand the effectiveness of DNNs: their impact on the dimensional robustness of the representations. In particular, we conduct extensive experiments involving both parallel DNNs and stacked DNNs. Our evaluation encompasses an overall study of complete DNN on two feature interaction models, alongside a fine-grained ablation analysis of components within DNNs. Experimental results demonstrate that both parallel and stacked DNNs can effectively mitigate the dimensional collapse of embeddings. Furthermore, a gradient-based theoretical analysis, supported by empirical evidence, uncovers the underlying mechanisms of dimensional collapse. The code is accessible for reproduction. https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/Dimensional-Collapse-Analysis
Jiancheng Wang 0001, Mingjia Yin, Hao Wang 0076, Enhong Chen
SIGIR1