Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiancheng Wang 0001
dblp:34/10219-1
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-3532-3699ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Learning theory · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
dimensional collapse |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective · SIGIR 2026 |
Recommender systems › click-through rate prediction
feature interaction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
deep network analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse Perspective · SIGIR 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based analysis · 2.0ablation study · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Understanding DNNs in Feature Interaction Models: A Dimensional Collapse PerspectiveabstractDNNs have gained widespread adoption in feature interaction recommendation models. However, there has been a longstanding debate on their roles. On one hand, some works claim that DNNs possess the ability to implicitly capture high-order feature interactions. Conversely, recent studies have highlighted the limitations of DNNs in effectively learning dot products, specifically second-order interactions, let alone higher-order interactions. In this paper, we present a novel perspective to understand the effectiveness of DNNs: their impact on the dimensional robustness of the representations. In particular, we conduct extensive experiments involving both parallel DNNs and stacked DNNs. Our evaluation encompasses an overall study of complete DNN on two feature interaction models, alongside a fine-grained ablation analysis of components within DNNs. Experimental results demonstrate that both parallel and stacked DNNs can effectively mitigate the dimensional collapse of embeddings. Furthermore, a gradient-based theoretical analysis, supported by empirical evidence, uncovers the underlying mechanisms of dimensional collapse. The code is accessible for reproduction. https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/Dimensional-Collapse-Analysis Jiancheng Wang 0001, Mingjia Yin, Hao Wang 0076, Enhong Chen |
SIGIR | 1 |