Programs written in unsafe languages like C and C++ often suffer from errors like buffer overflows, dangling pointers, and memory leaks. Dynamic analysis tools like Valgrind can detect these errors, but their overhead---primarily due to the cost of instrumenting every memory read and write---makes them too heavyweight for use in deployed applications and makes testing with them painfully slow. The result is that much deployed software remains susceptible to these bugs, which are notoriously difficult to track down.

Improving performance is a central concern for software developers. To locate optimization opportunities, developers rely on software profilers. However, these profilers only report where programs spent their time: optimizing that code may have no impact on performance. Past profilers thus both waste developer time and make it difficult for them to uncover significant optimization opportunities.

Researchers and software developers require effective performance evaluation. Researchers must evaluate optimizations or measure overhead. Software developers use automatic performance regression tests to discover when changes improve or degrade performance. The standard methodology is to compare execution times before and after applying changes.

Probabilistic timing analysis (PTA), a promising alternative to traditional worst-case execution time (WCET) analyses, enables pairing time bounds (named probabilistic WCET or pWCET) with an exceedance probability (e.g., 10−16), resulting in far tighter bounds than conventional analyses. However, the applicability of PTA has been limited because of its dependence on relatively exotic hardware: fully-associative caches using random replacement. This paper extends the applicability of PTA to conventional cache designs via a software-only approach. We show that, by using a combination of compiler techniques and runtime system support to randomise the memory layout of both code and data, conventional caches behave as fully-associative ones with random replacement.

Humans can perform many tasks with ease that remain difficult or impossible for computers. Crowdsourcing platforms like Amazon's Mechanical Turk make it possible to harness human-based computational power at an unprecedented scale. However, their utility as a general-purpose computational platform remains limited. The lack of complete automation makes it difficult to orchestrate complex or interrelated tasks. Scheduling more human workers to reduce latency costs real money, and jobs must be monitored and rescheduled when workers fail to complete their tasks. Furthermore, it is often difficult to predict the length of time and payment that should be budgeted for a given task. Finally, the results of human-based computations are not necessarily reliable, both because human skills and accuracy vary widely, and because workers have a financial incentive to minimize their effort.

Multithreaded programming is notoriously difficult to get right. A key problem is non-determinism, which complicates debugging, testing, and reproducing errors. One way to simplify multithreaded programming is to enforce deterministic execution, but current deterministic systems for C/C++ are incomplete or impractical. These systems require program modification, do not ensure determinism in the presence of data races, do not work with general-purpose multithreaded programs, or run up to 8.4× slower than pthreads.