Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akanksha Prakash
dblp:34/11050
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Health and well-being technologies · 52% Human-robot interaction · 42% Accessibility and assistive technology · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › robot design
robot appearance design |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Older adults' reactions to a robot's appearance in the context of home use · HRI 2014 |
Health and well-being technologies › elderly care
aging in place |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place · HRI 2012 |
Human-robot interaction
assistive robotics |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place · HRI 2012 |
Health and well-being technologies › elderly care
assistive robots for older adults |
0.1 | 2 | 2014 | Older adults' reactions to a robot's appearance in the context of home use · HRI 2014 Older adults' medication management in the home: how can robots help? · HRI 2013 |
Accessibility and assistive technology
older adults |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place · HRI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interview study · 0.2structured group interview · 0.1questionnaire · 0.1needs assessment · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Older adults' reactions to a robot's appearance in the context of home useabstractRobots are being designed to assist older adults in their homes. However, we lack a clear understanding of the aspects of robot appearance older adults pay attention to and consider important for accepting a robot in their homes. The goal of this study was to systematically assess older adults' reactions to a specific robot's appearance in the context of home use. Independent living older adults interacted with the PR2 and were interviewed about its appearance. In general, there was expectation for a small sized robot that fits with the home and is easy to control. There was variability for desired human-likeness, although some human-like characteristics might be acceptable to most. Akanksha Prakash, Charles C. Kemp, Wendy A. Rogers |
HRI | 1 |
| 2013 | Older adults' medication management in the home: how can robots help?
Akanksha Prakash, Jenay M. Beer, Travis Deyle, Cory-Ann Smarr, Tiffany L. Chen, Tracy L. Mitzner, Charles C. Kemp, Wendy A. Rogers |
HRI | 1 |
| 2012 | The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in placeabstractMany older adults wish to remain in their own homes as they age [16]. However, challenges in performing home upkeep tasks threaten an older adult's ability to age in place. Even healthy independently living older adults experience challenges in maintaining their home [13]. Challenges with home tasks can be compensated through technology, such as home robots. However, for home robots to be adopted by older adult users, they must be designed to meet older adults' needs for assistance and the older users must be amenable to robot assistance for those needs. We conducted a needs assessment to (1) assess older adults' openness to assistance from robots; and (2) understand older adults' opinions about using an assistive robot to help around the home. We administered questionnaires and conducted structured group interviews with 21 independently living older adults (ages 65-93). The questionnaire data suggest that older adults prefer robot assistance for cleaning and fetching/organizing tasks overall. However their assistance preferences discriminated between tasks. The interview data provided insight as to why they hold such preferences. Older adults reported benefits of robot assistance (e.g., the robot compensating for limitations, saving them time and effort, completing undesirable tasks, and performing tasks at a high level of performance). Participants also reported concerns such as the robot damaging the environment, being unreliable at or incapable of doing a task, doing tasks the older adult would rather do, or taking up too much space/storage. These data, along with specific comments from participant interviews, provide the basis for preliminary recommendations for designing mobile manipulator robots to support aging in place. Jenay M. Beer, Cory-Ann Smarr, Tiffany L. Chen, Akanksha Prakash, Tracy L. Mitzner, Charles C. Kemp, Wendy A. Rogers |
HRI | 4 |