Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tugkan Batu
dblp:34/1297
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
18as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3914-4645ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 15 · 15 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
12 papers |
Computational complexity · 61% Information theory · 20% Algorithms and data structures · 14% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
property testing |
0.6 | 7 | 2017 | Generalized Uniformity Testing · FOCS 2017 Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013 Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributions · STOC 2004 |
Computational complexity › property testing
distribution testing |
0.6 | 6 | 2017 | Generalized Uniformity Testing · FOCS 2017 Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013 Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributions · STOC 2004 |
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
uniformity testing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Generalized Uniformity Testing · FOCS 2017 |
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013 Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
l1 distance |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
statistical distance |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
string algorithms |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Oblivious string embeddings and edit distance approximations · SODA 2006 Reconstructing strings from random traces · SODA 2004 |
Algorithms and data structures › sublinear algorithms
sublinear-time algorithms |
0.1 | 3 | 2004 | A sublinear algorithm for weakly approximating edit distance · STOC 2003 The complexity of approximating entropy · STOC 2002 Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributions · STOC 2004 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
independence testing |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributions · STOC 2004 Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity · FOCS 2001 |
Information theory › information measures
entropy |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | The Complexity of Approximating the Entropy · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 The complexity of approximating entropy · STOC 2002 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
edit distance |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Oblivious string embeddings and edit distance approximations · SODA 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms › edit distance
edit distance approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Oblivious string embeddings and edit distance approximations · SODA 2006 |
Information theory › information measures › entropy
entropy approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The Complexity of Approximating the Entropy · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 |
Mathematical optimization
oracle model |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The Complexity of Approximating the Entropy · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 |
Computational complexity
probabilistically checkable proofs |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Fast approximate PCPs for multidimensional bin-packing problems · Inf. Comput. 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov chain |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Inferring Mixtures of Markov Chains · COLT 2004 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Inferring Mixtures of Markov Chains · COLT 2004 |
Computational complexity › property testing › boolean function testing
monotonicity testing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributions · STOC 2004 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
string reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reconstructing strings from random traces · SODA 2004 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms › string reconstruction
trace reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reconstructing strings from random traces · SODA 2004 |
Information theory › estimation theory
entropy estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The complexity of approximating entropy · STOC 2002 |
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The Complexity of Approximating the Entropy · CCC 2002 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › randomized approximation
sampling-based approximation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The complexity of approximating entropy · STOC 2002 |
Information theory › information measures › entropy
shannon entropy |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The Complexity of Approximating the Entropy · CCC 2002 |
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity
identity testing |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity · FOCS 2001 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › probabilistic model checking
markov chain model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › markov chain monte carlo
rapid mixing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000 |
Approximation and online algorithms
bin packing |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Fast approximate PCPs for multidimensional bin-packing problems · Inf. Comput. 2005 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The Complexity of Approximating the Entropy · CCC 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sample complexity bounds · 0.3adaptive algorithm · 0.3sampling · 0.2lower bound · 0.2sublinear sampling · 0.2markov chain mixing analysis · 0.2sample complexity lower bounds · 0.1l1 distance · 0.1multiplicative approximation · 0.1mixture inference · 0.0input representation models · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All You Need are Random Walks: Fast and Simple Distributed Conductance Testing
Tugkan Batu, Amitabh Trehan, Chhaya Trehan |
SIROCCO | 1 |
| 2017 | Generalized Uniformity TestingabstractIn this work, we revisit the problem of uniformity testing of discrete probability distributions. A fundamental problem in distribution testing, testing uniformity over a known domain has been addressed over a significant line of works, and is by now fully understood. The complexity of deciding whether an unknown distribution is uniform over its unknown (and arbitrary) support, however, is much less clear. Yet, this task arises as soon as no prior knowledge on the domain is available, or whenever the samples originate from an unknown and unstructured universe.In this work, we introduce and study this generalized uniformity testing question, and establish nearly tight upper and lower bound showing that - quite surprisingly - its sample complexity significantly differs from the known-domain case. Moreover, our algorithm is intrinsically adaptive, in contrast to the overwhelming majority of known distribution testing algorithms. Tugkan Batu, Clément L. Canonne |
FOCS | 1 |
| 2016 | Competitive Portfolio Selection Using Stochastic Predictions
Tugkan Batu, Pongphat Taptagaporn |
ALT | 1 |
| 2013 | Testing Closeness of Discrete DistributionsabstractGiven samples from two distributions over an n -element set, we wish to test whether these distributions are statistically close. We present an algorithm which uses sublinear in n , specifically, O ( n 2/3 ε −8/3 log n ), independent samples from each distribution, runs in time linear in the sample size, makes no assumptions about the structure of the distributions, and distinguishes the cases when the distance between the distributions is small (less than { ε 4/3 n −1/3 /32, εn −1/2 /4}) or large (more than ε ) in ℓ 1 distance. This result can be compared to the lower bound of Ω ( n 2/3 ε −2/3 ) for this problem given by Valiant [2008]. Our algorithm has applications to the problem of testing whether a given Markov process is rapidly mixing. We present sublinear algorithms for several variants of this problem as well. Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, Patrick White |
J. ACM | 1 |
| 2010 | Chains-into-Bins Processes
Tugkan Batu, Petra Berenbrink, Colin Cooper |
IWOCA | 1 |
| 2009 | A sublinear-time approximation scheme for bin packing
Tugkan Batu, Petra Berenbrink, Christian Sohler |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 2006 | Oblivious string embeddings and edit distance approximations
Tugkan Batu, Funda Ergün, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp |
SODA | 1 |
| 2005 | Locally Consistent Parsing and Applications to Approximate String Comparisons
Tugkan Batu, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp |
Developments in Language Theory | 1 |
| 2005 | Fast approximate PCPs for multidimensional bin-packing problems
Tugkan Batu, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Patrick White |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |
| 2005 | The Complexity of Approximating the EntropyabstractWe consider the problem of approximating the entropy of a discrete distribution under several different models of oracle access to the distribution. In the evaluation oracle model, the algorithm is given access to the explicit array of probabilities specifying the distribution. In this model, linear time in the size of the domain is both necessary and sufficient for approximating the entropy. In the generation oracle model, the algorithm has access only to independent samples from the distribution. In this case, we show that a $\gamma$-multiplicative approximation to the entropy can be obtained in $O(n^{(1+\eta)/\gamma^2} \log n)$ time for distributions with entropy $\Omega(\gamma/\eta)$, where n is the size of the domain of the distribution and $\eta$ is an arbitrarily small positive constant. We show that this model does not permit a multiplicative approximation to the entropy in general. For the class of distributions to which our upper bound applies, we obtain a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{1/(2\gamma^2)})$. We next consider a combined oracle model in which the algorithm has access to both the generation and the evaluation oracles of the distribution. In this model, significantly greater efficiency can be achieved: we present an algorithm for $\gamma$-multiplicative approximation to the entropy that runs in $O((\gamma^2 \log^2{n})/(h^2 (\gamma-1)^2))$ time for distributions with entropy $\Omega(h)$; for such distributions, we also show a lower bound of $\Omega((\log n)/(h(\gamma^2-1)+\gamma^2))$. Finally, we consider two special families of distributions: those in which the probabilities of the elements decrease monotonically with respect to a known ordering of the domain, and those that are uniform over a subset of the domain. In each case, we give more efficient algorithms for approximating the entropy. Tugkan Batu, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ronitt Rubinfeld |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2004 | Inferring Mixtures of Markov Chains
Tugkan Batu, Sudipto Guha, Sampath Kannan |
COLT | 1 |
| 2004 | Reconstructing strings from random traces
Tugkan Batu, Sampath Kannan, Sanjeev Khanna, Andrew McGregor 0001 |
SODA | 1 |
| 2004 | Sublinear algorithms for testing monotone and unimodal distributionsabstractThe complexity of testing properties of monotone and unimodal distributions, when given access only to samples of the distribution, is investigated. Two kinds of sublineartime algorithms—those for testing monotonicity and those that take advantage of monotonicity—are provided. The first algorithm tests if a given distribution on [n] is monotone or far away from any monotone distribution in L1-norm;this algorithm uses Õ(√n) samples and is shown to be nearly optimal. The next algorithm, given a joint distribution on [n]×[n], tests if it is monotone or is far away from any monotone distribution in L1-norm;this algorithm uses Õ(n3/2)samples. The problems of testing if two monotone distributions are close in L1-norm and if two random variables with a monotone joint distribution are close to being independent in L1-norm are also considered. Algorithms for these problems that use only poly(log n) samples are presented. The closeness and independence testing algorithms for monotone distributions are significantly more efficient than the corresponding algorithms as well as the lower bounds for arbitrary distributions. Some of the above results are also extended to unimodal distributions. Tugkan Batu, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ronitt Rubinfeld |
STOC | 1 |
| 2003 | A sublinear algorithm for weakly approximating edit distanceabstractWe show how to determine whether the edit distance between two given strings is small in sublinear time. Specifically, we present a test which, given two n-character strings A and B, runs in time o(n) and with high probability returns "CLOSE" if their edit distance is O(nΑ), and "FAR" if their edit distance is Ω(n), where Α is a fixed parameter less than 1. Our algorithm for testing the edit distance works by recursively subdividing the strings A and B into smaller substrings and looking for pairs of substrings in A, B with small edit distance. To do this, we query both strings at random places using a special technique for economizing on the samples which does not pick the samples independently and provides better query and overall complexity. As a result, our test runs in time Õ(nmax(Α/2, 2Α - 1\)) for any fixed Α < 1. Our algorithm thus provides a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency that is particularly useful when the input data is very large.We also show a lower bound of Ω(nΑ/2) on the query complexity of every algorithm that distinguishes pairs of strings with edit distance at most nΑ from those with edit distance at least n/6. Tugkan Batu, Funda Ergün, Joe Kilian, Avner Magen, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Rahul Sami |
STOC | 1 |
| 2002 | The Complexity of Approximating the EntropyabstractThe Shannon entropy is a measure of the randomness of a distribution, and plays a central role in statistics, information theory, and data compression. Knowing the entropy of a random source can shed light on the compressibility of data produced by such a source. We consider the complexity of approximating the entropy under various different assumptions on the way the input is presented. Tugkan Batu, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ronitt Rubinfeld |
CCC | 1 |
| 2002 | The complexity of approximating entropyabstract(MATH) We consider the problem of approximating the entropy of a discrete distribution under several models. If the distribution is given explicitly as an array where the i-th location is the probability of the i-th element, then linear time is both necessary and sufficient for approximating the entropy.We consider a model in which the algorithm is given access only to independent samples from the distribution. Here, we show that a λ-multiplicative approximation to the entropy can be obtained in O(n(1+η)/λ2 < poly(log n)) time for distributions with entropy Ω(λ η), where n is the size of the domain of the distribution and η is an arbitrarily small positive constant. We show that one cannot get a multiplicative approximation to the entropy in general in this model. Even for the class of distributions to which our upper bound applies, we obtain a lower bound of Ω(nmax(1/(2λ2), 2/(5λ2—2)).We next consider a hybrid model in which both the explicit distribution as well as independent samples are available. Here, significantly more efficient algorithms can be achieved: a λ-multiplicative approximation to the entropy can be obtained in O(λ2.Finally, we consider two special families of distributions: those for which the probability of an element decreases monotonically in the label of the element, and those that are uniform over a subset of the domain. In each case, we give more efficient algorithms for approximating the entropy. Tugkan Batu, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ronitt Rubinfeld |
STOC | 1 |
| 2001 | Testing Random Variables for Independence and IdentityabstractGiven access to independent samples of a distribution A over [n] /spl times/ [m], we show how to test whether the distributions formed by projecting A to each coordinate are independent, i.e., whether A is /spl epsi/-close in the L/sub 1/ norm to the product distribution A/sub 1//spl times/A/sub 2/ for some distributions A/sub 1/ over [n] and A/sub 2/ over [m]. The sample complexity of our test is O/spl tilde/(n/sup 2/3/m/sup 1/3/poly(/spl epsi//sup -1/)), assuming without loss of generality that m/spl les/n. We also give a matching lower bound, up to poly (log n, /spl epsi//sup -1/) factors. Furthermore, given access to samples of a distribution X over [n], we show how to test if X is /spl epsi/-close in L/sub 1/ norm to an explicitly specified distribution Y. Our test uses O/spl tilde/(n/sup 1/2/poly(/spl epsi//sup -1/)) samples, which nearly matches the known tight bounds for the case when Y is uniform. Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Eldar Fischer, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Patrick White |
FOCS | 1 |
| 2000 | Testing that distributions are closeabstractGiven two distributions over an n element set, we wish to check whether these distributions are statistically close by only sampling. We give a sublinear algorithm which uses O(n/sup 2/3//spl epsiv//sup -4/ log n) independent samples from each distribution, runs in time linear in the sample size, makes no assumptions about the structure of the distributions, and distinguishes the cases when the distance between the distributions is small (less than max(/spl epsiv//sup 2//32/sup 3//spl radic/n,/spl epsiv//4/spl radic/n=)) or large (more than /spl epsiv/) in L/sub 1/-distance. We also give an /spl Omega/(n/sup 2/3//spl epsiv//sup -2/3/) lower bound. Our algorithm has applications to the problem of checking whether a given Markov process is rapidly mixing. We develop sublinear algorithms for this problem as well. Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, Patrick White |
FOCS | 1 |