Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephan Balev

dblp:34/1886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 87% High-performance computing · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › data distribution
block-cyclic distribution
0.012003
Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2003
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computation models
bulk synchronous parallel
0.012003
Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2003
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.012003
Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2003
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel program transformation
tiling
0.012003
Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2003
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.012003
Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2003
High-performance computing
sequence alignment
0.012003
Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

closed-form optimization · 0.0BSP performance modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Optimal Semi-Oblique Tiling
abstract
For 2D iteration space tiling, we address the problem of determining the tile parameters that minimize the total execution time on a parallel machine. We consider uniform dependency computations tiled so that (at least) one of the tile boundaries is parallel to the domain boundaries. We determine the optimal tile size as a closed form solution. In addition, we determine the optimal number of processors and also the optimal slope of the oblique tile boundary. Our results are based on the BSP model, which assures the portability of the results. Our predictions are justified on a sequence global alignment problem specialized to similar sequences using Fickett's k-band algorithm, for which our optimal semi-oblique tiling yields an improvement of a factor of 2.5 over orthogonal tiling. Our optimal solution requires a block-cyclic distribution of tiles to processors. The best one can obtain with only block distribution (as many authors require) is three times slower. Furthermore, our best running time is within 10 percent of the "predicted theoretical peak" performance of the machine!.
Rumen Andonov, Stephan Balev, Sanjay V. Rajopadhye, Nicola Yanev
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2
2001 Optimal semi-oblique tiling
abstract
For 2-D iteration space tiling, we address the problem of determining the tile parameters that minimize the total execution time under the BSP model. We consider uniform dependency computations, tiled so that (at least) one of the tile boundaries is parallel to the domain boundary. We determine the optimal tile size as a closed form solution. In addition, we determine the optimal number of processors and also the optimal slope of the oblique tile boundary.
Rumen Andonov, Stephan Balev, Sanjay V. Rajopadhye, Nicola Yanev
SPAA2
1999 A Parallel Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Classification Problem
Stephan Balev, Rumen Andonov, Arnaud Fréville
HiPC1
1998 Linear Programming Models for Scheduling Systems of Affine Recurrence Equations - A Comparative Study
Stephan Balev, Patrice Quinton, Sanjay V. Rajopadhye, Tanguy Risset
SPAA1