Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorant Porkolab

dblp:34/2190 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 14 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Mathematical optimization · 61% Approximation and online algorithms · 35% Computational geometry · 3%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
scheduling
0.142005
General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time of Multiprocessor Tasks with Release Dates · ICALP 2001
Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
multiprocessor scheduling
0.122005
General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time of Multiprocessor Tasks with Release Dates · ICALP 2001
Approximation and online algorithms
scheduling approximation
0.122005
General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation schemes
0.132000
Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000
Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999
Linear-Time Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Malleable Parallel Tasks · SODA 1999
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › job scheduling
preemptive scheduling
0.112005
General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
job shop scheduling
0.012000
Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme
0.012000
Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
FPTAS
0.011999
Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
parallel machine scheduling
0.011999
Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › parallel machine scheduling
unrelated machines
0.011999
Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999
Computational geometry › convex geometry
convex sets
0.011997
Computing Integral Points in Convex Semi-algebraic Sets · FOCS 1997
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.011997
Computing Integral Points in Convex Semi-algebraic Sets · FOCS 1997
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
multiprocessor scheduling
0.012000
Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear-time algorithm · 0.1fully polynomial time approximation scheme · 0.1scheduling theory · 0.0approximation algorithm · 0.0linear-time approximation scheme · 0.0fully polynomial approximation scheme · 0.0polynomial inequalities · 0.0binary length bounds · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 On PreemptiveResource Constrained Scheduling: Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes
abstract
We study resource constrained scheduling problems where the objective is to compute feasible preemptive schedules minimizing the makespan and using no more resources than what are available. We present approximation schemes along with some inapproximability results showing how the approximability of the problem changes in terms of the number of resources. The results are based on linear programming formulations (though with exponentially many variables) and some interesting connections between resource constrained scheduling and (multidimensional, multiple-choice, and cardinality constrained) variants of the classical knapsack problem. In order to prove the results we generalize a method by Grigoriadis et al. for the max-min resource sharing problem to the case with weak approximate block solvers (i.e., with only constant, logarithmic, or even worse approximation ratios). Finally, we present applications of the above results in fractional graph coloring and multiprocessor task scheduling.
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
2005 General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time
abstract
We study the problem of scheduling n independent tasks on a set of m parallel processors, where the execution time of a task is a function of the subset of processors assigned to the task. For any fixed m, we propose a fully polynomial approximation scheme that for any fixed $\epsilon > 0$ finds a preemptive schedule of length at most $(1+\epsilon)$ times the optimum in $O(n)$ time. We also discuss the nonpreemptive variant of the problem, and present for any fixed m a polynomial approximation scheme that computes an approximate solution of any fixed accuracy in linear time. In terms of the running time, this linear complexity bound gives a substantial improvement of the best previously known polynomial bound [J. Chen and A. Miranda, SIAM J. Comput., 31 (2001), pp. 1--17].
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
SIAM J. Comput.2
2002 On Preemptive Resource Constrained Scheduling: Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
IPCO2
2002 Linear-Time Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Malleable Parallel Tasks
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
Algorithmica2
2001 On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time: A PTAS for Scheduling General Multiprocessor Tasks
Aleksei V. Fishkin, Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
FCT3
2001 On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time of Multiprocessor Tasks with Release Dates
Aleksei V. Fishkin, Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
ICALP3
2000 Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
ICALP2
2000 Preemptive Parallel Task Scheduling in O(n)+Poly(m) Time
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
ISAAC2
2000 Preemptive Scheduling on Dedicated Processors: Applications of Fractional Graph Coloring
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
MFCS2
2000 Integer Optimization on Convex Semialgebraic Sets
Leonid Khachiyan, Lorant Porkolab
Discret. Comput. Geom.2
1999 Linear-Time Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Malleable Parallel Tasks
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
SODA2
1999 Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines
abstract
We consider the problem of scheduling n independent jobs on m unrelated parallel machines.Each job has to be processed by exactly one machine, processing job j on machine i requires p;j time units, and the objective is to minimize the makespan, i.e. the maximum job completion time.We focus on the caSe when n is fixed and develop a fully polynomial approximation scheme whose running time depends only linearly on n.In the second half of the paper we extend this result to a variant of the problem, where processing job j on machine i also incurs a cost of cij, and thus there are two optimization criteria: makespan and cost.We show that for any fixed m, there is a fully polynomial approximation scheme that, given values T and C, computes for any fixed E > 0 a schedule in O(n) time with makespan at most (1 + e)T and cost at most (1 + e)C, if there exists a schedule of makespan T and cost C.
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
STOC2
1999 General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab
WADS2
1997 Computing Integral Points in Convex Semi-algebraic Sets
abstract
Let Y be a convex set in R/sup k/ defined by polynomial inequalities and equations of degree at most d/spl ges/2 with integer coefficients of binary length l. We show that if Y/spl cap/Z/sup k//spl ne//spl theta/, then Y contains an integral point of binary length ld/sup O/((k/sup 4/)). For fixed k, our bound implies a polynomial-time algorithm for computing an integral point y/spl isin/Y. In particular, we extend Lenstra's theorem on the polynomial-time solvability of linear integer programming in fixed dimension to semidefinite integer programming.
Leonid Khachiyan, Lorant Porkolab
FOCS2
1997 On the Complexity of Semidefinite Programs
Lorant Porkolab, Leonid Khachiyan
J. Glob. Optim.1