Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lorant Porkolab
dblp:34/2190
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 14 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 61% Approximation and online algorithms · 35% Computational geometry · 3% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
scheduling |
0.1 | 4 | 2005 | General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time of Multiprocessor Tasks with Release Dates · ICALP 2001 Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
multiprocessor scheduling |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time of Multiprocessor Tasks with Release Dates · ICALP 2001 |
Approximation and online algorithms
scheduling approximation |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation schemes |
0.1 | 3 | 2000 | Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000 Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999 Linear-Time Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Malleable Parallel Tasks · SODA 1999 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › job scheduling
preemptive scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time · SIAM J. Comput. 2005 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
job shop scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
FPTAS |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
parallel machine scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › parallel machine scheduling
unrelated machines |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel Machines · STOC 1999 |
Computational geometry › convex geometry
convex sets |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Computing Integral Points in Convex Semi-algebraic Sets · FOCS 1997 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Computing Integral Points in Convex Semi-algebraic Sets · FOCS 1997 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
multiprocessor scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling · ICALP 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear-time algorithm · 0.1fully polynomial time approximation scheme · 0.1scheduling theory · 0.0approximation algorithm · 0.0linear-time approximation scheme · 0.0fully polynomial approximation scheme · 0.0polynomial inequalities · 0.0binary length bounds · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | On PreemptiveResource Constrained Scheduling: Polynomial-Time Approximation SchemesabstractWe study resource constrained scheduling problems where the objective is to compute feasible preemptive schedules minimizing the makespan and using no more resources than what are available. We present approximation schemes along with some inapproximability results showing how the approximability of the problem changes in terms of the number of resources. The results are based on linear programming formulations (though with exponentially many variables) and some interesting connections between resource constrained scheduling and (multidimensional, multiple-choice, and cardinality constrained) variants of the classical knapsack problem. In order to prove the results we generalize a method by Grigoriadis et al. for the max-min resource sharing problem to the case with weak approximate block solvers (i.e., with only constant, logarithmic, or even worse approximation ratios). Finally, we present applications of the above results in fractional graph coloring and multiprocessor task scheduling. Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 2 |
| 2005 | General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear TimeabstractWe study the problem of scheduling n independent tasks on a set of m parallel processors, where the execution time of a task is a function of the subset of processors assigned to the task. For any fixed m, we propose a fully polynomial approximation scheme that for any fixed $\epsilon > 0$ finds a preemptive schedule of length at most $(1+\epsilon)$ times the optimum in $O(n)$ time. We also discuss the nonpreemptive variant of the problem, and present for any fixed m a polynomial approximation scheme that computes an approximate solution of any fixed accuracy in linear time. In terms of the running time, this linear complexity bound gives a substantial improvement of the best previously known polynomial bound [J. Chen and A. Miranda, SIAM J. Comput., 31 (2001), pp. 1--17]. Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
SIAM J. Comput. | 2 |
| 2002 | On Preemptive Resource Constrained Scheduling: Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
IPCO | 2 |
| 2002 | Linear-Time Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Malleable Parallel Tasks
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
Algorithmica | 2 |
| 2001 | On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time: A PTAS for Scheduling General Multiprocessor Tasks
Aleksei V. Fishkin, Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
FCT | 3 |
| 2001 | On Minimizing Average Weighted Completion Time of Multiprocessor Tasks with Release Dates
Aleksei V. Fishkin, Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
ICALP | 3 |
| 2000 | Polynominal Time Approximation Schemes for General Multiprocessor Job Shop Scheduling
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
ICALP | 2 |
| 2000 | Preemptive Parallel Task Scheduling in O(n)+Poly(m) Time
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
ISAAC | 2 |
| 2000 | Preemptive Scheduling on Dedicated Processors: Applications of Fractional Graph Coloring
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
MFCS | 2 |
| 2000 | Integer Optimization on Convex Semialgebraic Sets
Leonid Khachiyan, Lorant Porkolab |
Discret. Comput. Geom. | 2 |
| 1999 | Linear-Time Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Malleable Parallel Tasks
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
SODA | 2 |
| 1999 | Improved Approximation Schemes for Scheduling Unrelated Parallel MachinesabstractWe consider the problem of scheduling n independent jobs on m unrelated parallel machines.Each job has to be processed by exactly one machine, processing job j on machine i requires p;j time units, and the objective is to minimize the makespan, i.e. the maximum job completion time.We focus on the caSe when n is fixed and develop a fully polynomial approximation scheme whose running time depends only linearly on n.In the second half of the paper we extend this result to a variant of the problem, where processing job j on machine i also incurs a cost of cij, and thus there are two optimization criteria: makespan and cost.We show that for any fixed m, there is a fully polynomial approximation scheme that, given values T and C, computes for any fixed E > 0 a schedule in O(n) time with makespan at most (1 + e)T and cost at most (1 + e)C, if there exists a schedule of makespan T and cost C. Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
STOC | 2 |
| 1999 | General Multiprocessor Task Scheduling: Approximate Solutions in Linear Time
Klaus Jansen, Lorant Porkolab |
WADS | 2 |
| 1997 | Computing Integral Points in Convex Semi-algebraic SetsabstractLet Y be a convex set in R/sup k/ defined by polynomial inequalities and equations of degree at most d/spl ges/2 with integer coefficients of binary length l. We show that if Y/spl cap/Z/sup k//spl ne//spl theta/, then Y contains an integral point of binary length ld/sup O/((k/sup 4/)). For fixed k, our bound implies a polynomial-time algorithm for computing an integral point y/spl isin/Y. In particular, we extend Lenstra's theorem on the polynomial-time solvability of linear integer programming in fixed dimension to semidefinite integer programming. Leonid Khachiyan, Lorant Porkolab |
FOCS | 2 |
| 1997 | On the Complexity of Semidefinite Programs
Lorant Porkolab, Leonid Khachiyan |
J. Glob. Optim. | 1 |