Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hubert Niewiadomski
dblp:34/2800
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7345-3858ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 81% Graph learning · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph prompt learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Graph data management › graph database
distributed graph database |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Graph Database Interface: Scaling Online Transactional and Analytical Graph Workloads to Hundreds of Thousands of Cores · SC 2023 |
Graph data management
graph database |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Graph Database Interface: Scaling Online Transactional and Analytical Graph Workloads to Hundreds of Thousands of Cores · SC 2023 |
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Graph Database Interface: Scaling Online Transactional and Analytical Graph Workloads to Hundreds of Thousands of Cores · SC 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree-of-thoughts · 1.6chain-of-thought · 1.6one-sided communication · 1.3RDMA · 1.3MPI-inspired API · 1.3graph of thoughts · 0.9large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of ThoughtsabstractThe field of natural language processing (NLP) has witnessed significant progress in recent years, with a notable focus on improving large language models' (LLM) performance through innovative prompting techniques. Among these, prompt engineering coupled with structures has emerged as a promising paradigm, with designs such as Chain-of-Thought, Tree of Thoughts, or Graph of Thoughts, in which the overall LLM reasoning is guided by a structure such as a graph. As illustrated with numerous examples, this paradigm significantly enhances the LLM's capability to solve numerous tasks, ranging from logical or mathematical reasoning to planning or creative writing. To facilitate the understanding of this growing field and pave the way for future developments, we devise a general blueprint for effective and efficient LLM reasoning schemes. For this, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the prompt execution pipeline, clarifying and clearly defining different concepts. We then build the first taxonomy of structure-enhanced LLM reasoning schemes. We focus on identifying fundamental classes of harnessed structures, and we analyze the representations of these structures, algorithms executed with these structures, and many others. We refer to these structures as reasoning topologies, because their representation becomes to a degree spatial, as they are contained within the LLM context. Our study compares existing prompting schemes using the proposed taxonomy, discussing how certain design choices lead to different patterns in performance and cost. We also outline theoretical underpinnings, relationships between prompting and other parts of the LLM ecosystem such as knowledge bases, and the associated research challenges. Our work will help to advance future prompt engineering techniques. Maciej Besta, Florim Memedi, Robert Gerstenberger, Guangyuan Piao, Nils Blach, Piotr Nyczyk, Marcin Copik, Grzegorz Kwasniewski, Lukas Gianinazzi, Ales Kubicek, Hubert Niewiadomski, Aidan O'Mahony, Onur Mutlu, Torsten Hoefler |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 13 |
| 2024 | Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsabstractWe introduce Graph of Thoughts (GoT): a framework that advances prompting capabilities in large language models (LLMs) beyond those offered by paradigms such as Chain-of-Thought or Tree of Thoughts (ToT). The key idea and primary advantage of GoT is the ability to model the information generated by an LLM as an arbitrary graph, where units of information ("LLM thoughts") are vertices, and edges correspond to dependencies between these vertices. This approach enables combining arbitrary LLM thoughts into synergistic outcomes, distilling the essence of whole networks of thoughts, or enhancing thoughts using feedback loops. We illustrate that GoT offers advantages over state of the art on different tasks, for example increasing the quality of sorting by 62% over ToT, while simultaneously reducing costs by >31%. We ensure that GoT is extensible with new thought transformations and thus can be used to spearhead new prompting schemes. This work brings the LLM reasoning closer to human thinking or brain mechanisms such as recurrence, both of which form complex networks Maciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger, Michal Podstawski, Lukas Gianinazzi, Joanna Gajda, Tomasz Lehmann, Hubert Niewiadomski, Piotr Nyczyk, Torsten Hoefler |
AAAI | 9 |
| 2023 | The Graph Database Interface: Scaling Online Transactional and Analytical Graph Workloads to Hundreds of Thousands of CoresabstractGraph databases (GDBs) are crucial in academic and industry applications. The key challenges in developing GDBs are achieving high performance, scalability, programmability, and portability. To tackle these challenges, we harness established practices from the HPC landscape to build a system that outperforms all past GDBs presented in the literature by orders of magnitude, for both OLTP and OLAP workloads. For this, we first identify and crystallize performance-critical building blocks in the GDB design, and abstract them into a portable and programmable API specification, called the Graph Database Interface (GDI), inspired by the best practices of MPI. We then use GDI to design a GDB for distributed-memory RDMA architectures. Our implementation harnesses onesided RDMA communication and collective operations, and it offers architecture-independent theoretical performance guarantees. The resulting design achieves extreme scales of more than a hundred thousand cores. Our work will facilitate the development of next-generation extreme-scale graph databases. Maciej Besta, Robert Gerstenberger, Michal Podstawski, Nils Blach, Berke Egeli, George Mitenkov, Wojciech Chlapek, Marek T. Michalewicz, Hubert Niewiadomski, Torsten Hoefler |
SC | 10 |
| 2003 | NOAH, a tool for argument reduction, serial and parallel decomposition of decision tablesabstractA tool for managing decision tables was developed and presented in this paper. The tool uses a number of algorithms, namely argument reduction, serial and parallel decomposition to perform operations on these tables. With the help of these operations, reduction in size of the tables can be achieved, leading to smaller memory requirements. The tool is a result of extending previously described software packages by adding a convenient GUI. Michal Pleban, Hubert Niewiadomski, Piotr Buciak, Henry Selvaraj, Piotr Sapiecha, Tadeusz Luba |
DSD | 2 |