Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Sudeep Juvekar

dblp:34/2935 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 50% Program analysis · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 67% Logic in computer science · 33%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test generation
automated test generation
0.112009
WISE: Automated test generation for worst-case complexity · ICSE 2009
Program analysis
symbolic execution
0.112009
WISE: Automated test generation for worst-case complexity · ICSE 2009
Automata and formal languages › omega-automata
büchi automata
0.112006
Minimizing Generalized Büchi Automata · CAV 2006
Automata and formal languages › automata algorithms
state minimization
0.112006
Minimizing Generalized Büchi Automata · CAV 2006
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.112006
Minimizing Generalized Büchi Automata · CAV 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 0.1exhaustive test generation · 0.1simulation relations · 0.1generalized büchi automata · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 SNIFF: A Search Engine for Java Using Free-Form Queries
Shaunak Chatterjee, Sudeep Juvekar, Koushik Sen
FASE2
2009 WISE: Automated test generation for worst-case complexity
abstract
Program analysis and automated test generation have primarily been used to find correctness bugs. We present complexity testing, a novel automated test generation technique to find performance bugs. Our complexity testing algorithm, which we call WISE (worst-case inputs from symbolic execution), operates on a program accepting inputs of arbitrary size. For each input size, WISE attempts to construct an input which exhibits the worst-case computational complexity of the program. WISE uses exhaustive test generation for small input sizes and generalizes the result of executing the program on those inputs into an ldquoinput generator.rdquo The generator is subsequently used to efficiently generate worst-case inputs for larger input sizes. We have performed experiments to demonstrate the utility of our approach on a set of standard data structures and algorithms. Our results show that WISE can effectively generate worst-case inputs for several of these benchmarks.
Jacob Burnim, Sudeep Juvekar, Koushik Sen
ICSE2
2009 Fast Statistical Alignment
abstract
We describe a new program for the alignment of multiple biological sequences that is both statistically motivated and fast enough for problem sizes that arise in practice. Our Fast Statistical Alignment program is based on pair hidden Markov models which approximate an insertion/deletion process on a tree and uses a sequence annealing algorithm to combine the posterior probabilities estimated from these models into a multiple alignment. FSA uses its explicit statistical model to produce multiple alignments which are accompanied by estimates of the alignment accuracy and uncertainty for every column and character of the alignment--previously available only with alignment programs which use computationally-expensive Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches--yet can align thousands of long sequences. Moreover, FSA utilizes an unsupervised query-specific learning procedure for parameter estimation which leads to improved accuracy on benchmark reference alignments in comparison to existing programs. The centroid alignment approach taken by FSA, in combination with its learning procedure, drastically reduces the amount of false-positive alignment on biological data in comparison to that given by other methods. The FSA program and a companion visualization tool for exploring uncertainty in alignments can be used via a web interface at http://orangutan.math.berkeley.edu/fsa/, and the source code is available at http://fsa.sourceforge.net/.
Robert K. Bradley, Adam Roberts, Michael E. Smoot, Sudeep Juvekar, Jaeyoung Do, Colin N. Dewey, Ian H. Holmes, Lior Pachter
PLoS Comput. Biol.4
2006 Minimizing Generalized Büchi Automata
Sudeep Juvekar, Nir Piterman
CAV1