Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anand Meka

dblp:34/3028 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Network management and operations · 42% Network measurement and analytics · 33% Internet of things and sensor networks · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Indexing and storage engines · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations › network monitoring
reactive monitoring
0.112009
Optimization Techniques for Reactive Network Monitoring · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
Network management and operations › network monitoring
sensor network monitoring
0.012009
Optimization Techniques for Reactive Network Monitoring · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
Indexing and storage engines
distributed indexing
0.012007
MIST: Distributed Indexing and Querying in Sensor Networks using Statistical Models · VLDB 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical model · 0.1partition and rank scheduling · 0.1adaptive heuristics · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Optimization Techniques for Reactive Network Monitoring
abstract
We develop a framework for minimizing the communication overhead of monitoring global system parameters in IP networks and sensor networks. A global system predicate is defined as a conjunction of the local properties of different network elements. A typical example is to identify the time windows when the outbound traffic from each network element exceeds a predefined threshold. Our main idea is to optimize the scheduling of local event reporting across network elements for a given network traffic load and local event frequencies. The system architecture consists of N distributed network elements coordinated by a central monitoring station. Each network element monitors a set of local properties and the central station is responsible for identifying the status of global parameters registered in the system. We design an optimal algorithm, the Partition and Rank (PAR) scheme, when the local events are independent; whereas, when they are dependent, we show that the problem is NP-complete and develop two efficient heuristics: the PAR for dependent events (PAR-D) and Adaptive (Ada) algorithms, which adapt well to changing network conditions, and outperform the current state of the art techniques in terms of communication cost.
Ahmet Bulut, Nick Koudas, Anand Meka, Ambuj K. Singh, Divesh Srivastava
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.3
2007 MIST: Distributed Indexing and Querying in Sensor Networks using Statistical Models
Arnab Bhattacharya 0001, Anand Meka, Ambuj K. Singh
VLDB2
2006 Distributed Spatial Clustering in Sensor Networks
Anand Meka, Ambuj K. Singh
EDBT1
2005 DIST: a distributed spatio-temporal index structure for sensor networks
abstract
We consider the general problem of tracking moving objects in sensor networks. The specific application we consider is that of tracking a chemical plume moving over a large infrastructure network. We present a distributed index structure DIST that stores and updates distributed summaries as the plume moves. We present algorithms for range queries on the history of the plume. DIST localizes information with respect to time and space using a hierarchy that scales with the plume size. The highlight of our work is an analytical model to predict the cost of query algorithms based on the query location, query size, and plume's spatio-temporal distribution. Using this model, our adaptive scheme chooses the optimal scheme. Experimental results show that DIST outperforms alternative techniques in query, update, and storage costs, and scales well with the number of plumes.
Anand Meka, Ambuj K. Singh
CIKM1