Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Babak Esmaeili 0001
dblp:34/3055-1
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8403-558XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 37% Representation and self-supervised learning · 34% Generative modeling · 29% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
latent space geometry |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Topological Obstructions and How to Avoid Them · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Topological Obstructions and How to Avoid Them · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
importance sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Nested Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Nested Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › neural network representation learning
deep encoder training |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Topological Obstructions and How to Avoid Them · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 0.7variational inference · 0.5nested importance sampling · 0.5energy-based modeling · 0.5amortized inference · 0.5KL divergence minimization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Topological Obstructions and How to Avoid ThemabstractIncorporating geometric inductive biases into models can aid interpretability and generalization, but encoding to a specific geometric structure can be challenging due to the imposed topological constraints. In this paper, we theoretically and empirically characterize obstructions to training encoders with geometric latent spaces. We show that local optima can arise due to singularities (e.g. self-intersection) or due to an incorrect degree or winding number. We then discuss how normalizing flows can potentially circumvent these obstructions by defining multimodal variational distributions. Inspired by this observation, we propose a new flow-based model that maps data points to multimodal distributions over geometric spaces and empirically evaluate our model on 2 domains. We observe improved stability during training and a higher chance of converging to a homeomorphic encoder. Babak Esmaeili 0001, Robin Walters 0001, Heiko Zimmermann, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Rate-Regularization and Generalization in Variational AutoencodersabstractVariational autoencoders (VAEs) optimize an objective that comprises a reconstruction loss (the distortion) and a KL term (the rate). The rate is an upper bound on the mutual information, which is often interpreted as a regularizer that controls the degree of compression. We here examine whether inclusion of the rate term also improves generalization. We perform rate-distortion analyses in which we control the strength of the rate term, the network capacity, and the difficulty of the generalization problem. Lowering the strength of the rate term paradoxically improves generalization in most settings, and reducing the mutual information typically leads to underfitting. Moreover, we show that generalization performance continues to improve even after the mutual information saturates, indicating that the gap on the bound (i.e. the KL divergence relative to the inference marginal) affects generalization. This suggests that the standard spherical Gaussian prior is not an inductive bias that typically improves generalization, prompting further work to understand what choices of priors improve generalization in VAEs. Alican Bozkurt, Babak Esmaeili 0001, Jean-Baptiste Tristan, Dana H. Brooks, Jennifer G. Dy, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based ModelsabstractIn this paper, we propose conjugate energy-based models (CEBMs), a new class of energy-based models that define a joint density over data and latent variables. The joint density of a CEBM decomposes into an intractable distribution over data and a tractable posterior over latent variables. CEBMs have similar use cases as variational autoencoders, in the sense that they learn an unsupervised mapping from data to latent variables. However, these models omit a generator network, which allows them to learn more flexible notions of similarity between data points. Our experiments demonstrate that conjugate EBMs achieve competitive results in terms of image modelling, predictive power of latent space, and out-of-domain detection on a variety of datasets. Hao Wu 0020, Babak Esmaeili 0001, Michael L. Wick, Jean-Baptiste Tristan, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Nested Variational InferenceabstractWe develop nested variational inference (NVI), a family of methods that learn proposals for nested importance samplers by minimizing an forward or reverse KL divergence at each level of nesting. NVI is applicable to many commonly-used importance sampling strategies and provides a mechanism for learning intermediate densities, which can serve as heuristics to guide the sampler. Our experiments apply NVI to (a) sample from a multimodal distribution using a learned annealing path (b) learn heuristics that approximate the likelihood of future observations in a hidden Markov model and (c) to perform amortized inference in hierarchical deep generative models. We observe that optimizing nested objectives leads to improved sample quality in terms of log average weight and effective sample size. Heiko Zimmermann, Hao Wu 0020, Babak Esmaeili 0001, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Structured Disentangled RepresentationsabstractDeep latent-variable models learn representations of high-dimensional data in an unsupervised manner. A number of recent efforts have focused on learning representations that disentangle statistically independent axes of variation by introducing modifications to the standard objective function. These approaches generally assume a simple diagonal Gaussian prior and as a result are not able to reliably disentangle discrete factors of variation. We propose a two-level hierarchical objective to control relative degree of statistical independence between blocks of variables and individual variables within blocks. We derive this objective as a generalization of the evidence lower bound, which allows us to explicitly represent the trade-offs between mutual information between data and representation, KL divergence between representation and prior, and coverage of the support of the empirical data distribution. Experiments on a variety of datasets demonstrate that our objective can not only disentangle discrete variables, but that doing so also improves disentanglement of other variables and, importantly, generalization even to unseen combinations of factors. Babak Esmaeili 0001, Hao Wu 0020, Alican Bozkurt, N. Siddharth 0001, Brooks Paige, Dana H. Brooks, Jennifer G. Dy, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | Structured Neural Topic Models for ReviewsabstractWe present Variational Aspect-based Latent Topic Allocation (VALTA), a family of autoencoding topic models that learn aspect-based representations of reviews. VALTA defines a user-item encoder that maps bag-of-words vectors for combined reviews associated with each paired user and item onto structured embeddings, which in turn define per-aspect topic weights. We model individual reviews in a structured manner by inferring an aspect assignment for each sentence in a given review, where the per-aspect topic weights obtained by the user-item encoder serve to define a mixture over topics, conditioned on the aspect. The result is an autoencoding neural topic model for reviews, which can be trained in a fully unsupervised manner to learn topics that are structured into aspects. Experimental evaluation on large number of datasets demonstrates that aspects are interpretable, yield higher coherence scores than non-structured autoencoding topic model variants, and can be utilized to perform aspect-based comparison and genre discovery. Babak Esmaeili 0001, Hongyi Huang, Byron C. Wallace, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
AISTATS | 1 |