Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cory Barr

dblp:34/3717 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 64% Language models and text generation · 36%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.112008
Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisements · EC 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › lexicon learning
semantic class induction
0.112006
N Semantic Classes are Harder than Two · ACL 2006
Information retrieval › online advertising
sponsored search
0.012008
Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisements · EC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine-learned selection model · 0.2corpus mining · 0.2clustering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 The Linguistic Structure of English Web-Search Queries
Cory Barr, Rosie Jones, Moira Regelson
EMNLP1
2008 Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisements
abstract
In sponsored search, advertisers bid on phrases representative of offered products or services. For large advertisers, these phrases often come from quasi-algorithmically generated lists of thousands of terms prone to poor linguistic construction. A bidded term by itself is usually unsuitable for direct insertion into an ad copy template; it must be rephrased and capitalized properly to fit the template, possibly with additional language to avoid semantic ambiguity. We develop a natural language generation system to automate these steps, preparing a list of terms for insertion into an ad template. For each input term, our system first finds a proper word ordering by mining a corpus of Web search query logs. Next it determines whether the term is ambiguous and--if semantics dictate--attaches a clarifying modifier culled from query logs. Finally, it applies proper capitalization by analyzing pages from Web search engine results. Each step yields a plausible set of displayable forms from which a machine-learned model selects the best. The models are trained and tested on a large set of human-labeled data. The overall system significantly outperforms baseline systems that use simple heuristics.
Kevin Bartz, Cory Barr, Adil Aijaz
EC2
2006 N Semantic Classes are Harder than Two
Ben Carterette, Rosie Jones, Wiley Greiner, Cory Barr
ACL4