Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cory Barr
dblp:34/3717
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 64% Language models and text generation · 36% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisements · EC 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › lexicon learning
semantic class induction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | N Semantic Classes are Harder than Two · ACL 2006 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
sponsored search |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisements · EC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine-learned selection model · 0.2corpus mining · 0.2clustering · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | The Linguistic Structure of English Web-Search Queries
Cory Barr, Rosie Jones, Moira Regelson |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2008 | Natural language generation for sponsored-search advertisementsabstractIn sponsored search, advertisers bid on phrases representative of offered products or services. For large advertisers, these phrases often come from quasi-algorithmically generated lists of thousands of terms prone to poor linguistic construction. A bidded term by itself is usually unsuitable for direct insertion into an ad copy template; it must be rephrased and capitalized properly to fit the template, possibly with additional language to avoid semantic ambiguity. We develop a natural language generation system to automate these steps, preparing a list of terms for insertion into an ad template. For each input term, our system first finds a proper word ordering by mining a corpus of Web search query logs. Next it determines whether the term is ambiguous and--if semantics dictate--attaches a clarifying modifier culled from query logs. Finally, it applies proper capitalization by analyzing pages from Web search engine results. Each step yields a plausible set of displayable forms from which a machine-learned model selects the best. The models are trained and tested on a large set of human-labeled data. The overall system significantly outperforms baseline systems that use simple heuristics. Kevin Bartz, Cory Barr, Adil Aijaz |
EC | 2 |
| 2006 | N Semantic Classes are Harder than Two
Ben Carterette, Rosie Jones, Wiley Greiner, Cory Barr |
ACL | 4 |