Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ching-Chuan Chiang
dblp:34/4613
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 6 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Routing and switching · 55% Wireless networking · 24% Network performance modeling · 16% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking
mobile ad hoc networks |
0.0 | 2 | 1999 | Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999 On-Demand Multicast in Mobile Wireless Networks · ICNP 1998 |
Routing and switching › routing
hierarchical routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999 |
Routing and switching
routing protocol |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999 |
Network performance modeling › protocol performance analysis › routing performance
routing scalability |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999 |
Routing and switching
multicast routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | On-Demand Multicast in Mobile Wireless Networks · ICNP 1998 |
Internet architecture and protocols
quality of service |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1999 |
Wireless networking › wireless mesh network
multihop wireless network |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | On-Demand Multicast in Mobile Wireless Networks · ICNP 1998 |
Routing and switching › ad hoc network routing
on-demand routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | On-Demand Multicast in Mobile Wireless Networks · ICNP 1998 |
Routing and switching › routing protocol
route discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | On-Demand Multicast in Mobile Wireless Networks · ICNP 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0scoped flooding · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | On-demand multicast routing protocolabstractThis paper presents a novel multicast routing protocol for mobile ad hoc wireless networks. The protocol, termed ODMRP (on-demand multicast routing protocol), is a mesh-based, rather than a conventional tree-based multicast scheme and uses a forwarding group concept (only a subset of nodes forwards the multicast packets via scoped flooding). It applies on-demand procedures to dynamically build routes and maintain multicast group membership. ODMRP is well suited for ad hoc wireless networks with mobile hosts where bandwidth is limited, topology changes frequently, and power is constrained. We evaluate ODMRP's scalability and performance via simulation. Sung-Ju Lee 0001, Mario Gerla, Ching-Chuan Chiang |
WCNC | 3 |
| 1999 | A wireless hierarchical routing protocol with group mobilityabstractIn this paper we present a hierarchical routing protocol in a large wireless, mobile network such as found in the automated battlefield or in extensive disaster recovery operations. Conventional routing does not scale well to network size. Likewise, conventional hierarchical routing cannot handle mobility efficiently. We propose a novel soft state wireless hierarchical routing protocol-Hierarchical State Routing (HSR). We distinguish between the "physical" routing hierarchy (dictated by geographical relationships between nodes) and "logical" hierarchy of subnets in which the members move as a group (e.g., company, brigade, battalion in the battlefield). HSR keeps track of logical subnet movements using home agent concepts akin to Mobile IP. A group mobility model is introduced and the performance of the HSR is evaluated through a detailed wireless simulation model. Guangyu Pei, Mario Gerla, Xiaoyan Hong, Ching-Chuan Chiang |
WCNC | 4 |
| 1999 | Scalable routing strategies for ad hoc wireless networksabstractWe consider a large population of mobile stations that are interconnected by a multihop wireless network. The applications of this wireless infrastructure range from ad hoc networking (e.g., collaborative, distributed computing) to disaster recovery (e.g., fire, flood, earthquake), law enforcement (e.g., crowd control, search-and-rescue), and military (automated battlefield). Key characteristics of this system are the large number of users, their mobility, and the need to operate without the support of a fixed (wired or wireless) infrastructure. The last feature sets this system apart from existing cellular systems and in fact makes its design much more challenging. In this environment, we investigate routing strategies that scale well to large populations and can handle mobility. In addition, we address the need to support multimedia communications, with low latency requirements for interactive traffic and quality-of-service (QoS) support for real-time streams (voice/video). In the wireless routing area, several schemes have already been proposed and implemented (e.g., hierarchical routing, on-demand routing, etc.). We introduce two new schemes-fisheye state routing (FSR) and hierarchical state routing (HSR)-which offer some competitive advantages over the existing schemes. We compare the performance of existing and proposed schemes via simulation. Atsushi Iwata, Ching-Chuan Chiang, Guangyu Pei, Mario Gerla, Tsu-Wei Chen |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 2 |
| 1999 | Tree Multicast Strategies in Mobile, Multihop Wireless Networks
Mario Gerla, Ching-Chuan Chiang, Lixia Zhang 0001 |
Mob. Networks Appl. | 2 |
| 1998 | On-Demand Multicast in Mobile Wireless NetworksabstractWe propose an "on-demand" multicast routing protocol for a wireless, mobile, multihop network. The proposed scheme has two key features: (a) it is based on the forwarding group concept (i.e., a subset of nodes is in charge of forwarding the multicast packets via scoped flooding) rather than on the conventional multicast tree scheme (b) it dynamically refreshes the forward group members using a procedure akin to on-demand routing (hence the name). "On-demand" multicast is well suited to operate in an on-demand routing environment where routes are selectively computed as needed between communicating node pairs instead of being maintained and updated globally by a routing "infrastructure" (like in distance vector or link state, for example). On-demand multicast is particularly attractive in mobile, rapidly changing networks, where the traffic overhead caused by routing updates and tree reconfigurations may become prohibitive beyond a critical speed; and in large network with sparse traffic requirements, where the traffic, processing and storage overhead of the routing infrastructure solution compromises scalability. Via simulation, we compare on-demand multicast with a traditional tree multicast scheme, DVMRP, and with a version of forwarding group multicast which uses conventional distance vector routing instead of on-demand routing. This allows us to assess the penalty of the tree and of the global routing infrastructure as a function of mobility and sparseness. Ching-Chuan Chiang, Mario Gerla |
ICNP | 1 |
| 1997 | Shared Tree Wireless Network MulticastabstractIn this paper we propose a multicast protocol for a multihop, mobile wireless network with cluster based routing and token access protocol within each cluster. The multicast protocol uses a shared tree which is dynamically updated to adjust to changes in topology and membership (i.e. dynamic joins and quits). Two options for tree maintenance have been simulated and evaluated: "hard state" (i.e. each connection must be explicitly cleared) and "soft state" (each connection is automatically timed out and must be refreshed). For the soft state policy, the performance of different choices of timeout and refresh timers is first analyzed for a range of node mobility values. Next, soft state and hard state policies are compared based on throughput, join delay, and control overhead criteria. Ching-Chuan Chiang, Mario Gerla, Lixia Zhang 0001 |
ICCCN | 1 |