Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew B. Gardner
dblp:34/4909
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 87% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics
biomedical signal processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | One-Class Novelty Detection for Seizure Analysis from Intracranial EEG · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Medical and health informatics › EEG analysis
seizure detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | One-Class Novelty Detection for Seizure Analysis from Intracranial EEG · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
one-class support vector machine · 0.1mahalanobis distance outlier detection · 0.1leave-one-out cross-validation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Detecting DGA domains with recurrent neural networks and side informationabstractModern malware typically makes use of a domain generation algorithm (DGA) to avoid command and control domains or IPs being seized or sinkholed. This means that an infected system may attempt to access many domains in an attempt to contact the command and control server. Therefore, the automatic detection of DGA domains is an important task, both for the sake of blocking malicious domains and identifying compromised hosts. However, many DGAs use English wordlists to generate plausibly clean-looking domain names; this makes automatic detection difficult. In this work, we devise a notion of difficulty for DGA families called the smashword score; this measures how much a DGA family looks like English words. We find that this measure accurately reflects how much a DGA family's domains look like they are made from natural English words. We then describe our new modeling approach, which is a combination of a novel recurrent neural network architecture with domain registration side information. Our experiments show the model is capable of effectively identifying domains generated by difficult DGA families. Our experiments also show that our model outperforms existing approaches, and is able to reliably detect difficult DGA families such as matsnu, suppobox, rovnix, and others. The model's performance compared to the state of the art is best for DGA families that resemble English words. We believe that this model could either be used in a standalone DGA domain detector---such as an endpoint security application---or alternately the model could be used as a part of a larger malware detection system. Ryan R. Curtin, Andrew B. Gardner, Slawomir Grzonkowski, Alexey Kleymenov, Alejandro Mosquera |
ARES | 2 |
| 2019 | Exploiting the structure of furthest neighbor search for fast approximate results
Ryan R. Curtin, Javier R. Echauz, Andrew B. Gardner |
Inf. Syst. | 3 |
| 2016 | Fast Approximate Furthest Neighbors with Data-Dependent Candidate Selection
Ryan R. Curtin, Andrew B. Gardner |
SISAP | 2 |
| 2007 | The Effect of Recording Reference on EEG: Phase Synchrony and Coherence
Sanqing Hu, Matt Stead, Andrew B. Gardner, Gregory A. Worrell |
ISNN (2) | 3 |
| 2006 | One-Class Novelty Detection for Seizure Analysis from Intracranial EEGabstractThis paper describes an application of one-class support vector machine (SVM) novelty detection for detecting seizures in humans. Our technique maps intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) time series into corresponding novelty sequences by classifying short-time, energy-based statistics computed from one-second windows of data. We train a classifier on epochs of interictal (normal) EEG. During ictal (seizure) epochs of EEG, seizure activity induces distributional changes in feature space that increase the empirical outlier fraction. A hypothesis test determines when the parameter change differs significantly from its nominal value, signaling a seizure detection event. Outputs are gated in a .one-shot. manner using persistence to reduce the false alarm rate of the system. The detector was validated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) on a sample of 41 interictal and 29 ictal epochs, and achieved 97.1% sensitivity, a mean detection latency of -7.58 seconds, and an asymptotic false positive rate (FPR) of 1.56 false positives per hour (Fp/hr). These results are better than those obtained from a novelty detection technique based on Mahalanobis distance outlier detection, and comparable to the performance of a supervised learning technique used in experimental implantable devices (Echauz et al., 2001). The novelty detection paradigm overcomes three significant limitations of competing methods: the need to collect seizure data, precisely mark seizure onset and offset times, and perform patient-specific parameter tuning for detector training. Andrew B. Gardner, Abba M. Krieger, George J. Vachtsevanos, Brian Litt |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |