Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott Kagan
dblp:34/4974
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 91% Software testing · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program analysis › static analysis
call graph construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004 |
Program analysis
dynamic analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004 |
Software testing
test coverage |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis in the Presence of Large Libraries
Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Thomas J. Marlowe |
CC | 2 |
| 2005 | Coverage Criteria for Testing of Object Interactions in Sequence Diagrams
Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Jason Sawin |
FASE | 2 |
| 2004 | Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in JavaabstractThis work presents a parameterized framework for static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java components. Such analyses have a wide range of uses in tools for software understanding and testing. We also describe a test coverage tool built with these analyses and the use of the tool on a real-world test suite. Our experiments evaluate the exact precision of several instances of the framework and provide a novel approach for estimating the limits of class analysis technology for computing precise call chains. Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Michael Gibas |
ISSTA | 2 |
| 2004 | Evaluating the imprecision of static analysisabstractThis work discusses two non-traditional approaches for evaluating the imprecision of static analysis. The approaches are based on proofs of feasibility or infeasibility that are constructed manually by the experimenters. We also describe our initial experience with these techniques. Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Michael Gibas |
PASTE | 2 |