Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott Kagan

dblp:34/4974 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 91% Software testing · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › static analysis
call graph construction
0.012004
Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.012004
Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004
Program analysis
static analysis
0.012004
Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004
Software testing
test coverage
0.012004
Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java · ISSTA 2004
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis in the Presence of Large Libraries
Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Thomas J. Marlowe
CC2
2005 Coverage Criteria for Testing of Object Interactions in Sequence Diagrams
Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Jason Sawin
FASE2
2004 Static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java
abstract
This work presents a parameterized framework for static and dynamic analysis of call chains in Java components. Such analyses have a wide range of uses in tools for software understanding and testing. We also describe a test coverage tool built with these analyses and the use of the tool on a real-world test suite. Our experiments evaluate the exact precision of several instances of the framework and provide a novel approach for estimating the limits of class analysis technology for computing precise call chains.
Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Michael Gibas
ISSTA2
2004 Evaluating the imprecision of static analysis
abstract
This work discusses two non-traditional approaches for evaluating the imprecision of static analysis. The approaches are based on proofs of feasibility or infeasibility that are constructed manually by the experimenters. We also describe our initial experience with these techniques.
Atanas Rountev, Scott Kagan, Michael Gibas
PASTE2