Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dragos D. Margineantu
dblp:34/5356
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Generative modeling · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Verification of Semantic Key Point Detection for Aircraft Pose Estimation · KR 2023 Formal Analysis and Redesign of a Neural Network-Based Aircraft Taxiing System with VerifAI · CAV (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space manipulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
latent representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
low-dimensional embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyond · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Verification of Semantic Key Point Detection for Aircraft Pose Estimation · KR 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Verification of Semantic Key Point Detection for Aircraft Pose Estimation · KR 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
neural network control |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Formal Analysis and Redesign of a Neural Network-Based Aircraft Taxiing System with VerifAI · CAV (1) 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Formal Analysis and Redesign of a Neural Network-Based Aircraft Taxiing System with VerifAI · CAV (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
cost-sensitive active learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Active Cost-Sensitive Learning · IJCAI 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
cost-sensitive learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Active Cost-Sensitive Learning · IJCAI 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › resampling
bootstrap methods |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Bootstrap Methods for the Cost-Sensitive Evaluation of Classifiers · ICML 2000 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
classifier evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Bootstrap Methods for the Cost-Sensitive Evaluation of Classifiers · ICML 2000 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Bootstrap Methods for the Cost-Sensitive Evaluation of Classifiers · ICML 2000 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Pruning Adaptive Boosting · ICML 1997 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Pruning Adaptive Boosting · ICML 1997 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Pruning Adaptive Boosting · ICML 1997 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Pruning Adaptive Boosting · ICML 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal analysis · 1.0continuous normalizing flow · 0.9retraining · 0.9probabilistic scenario modeling · 0.9falsification · 0.9counterexample analysis · 0.9neural network verification · 0.7automated reasoning · 0.7active learning · 0.1bootstrap · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Linear combinations of latents in generative models: subspaces and beyondabstractSampling from generative models has become a crucial tool for applications like data synthesis and augmentation. Diffusion, Flow Matching and Continuous Normalising Flows have shown effectiveness across various modalities, and rely on latent variables for generation. For experimental design or creative applications that require more control over the generation process, it has become common to manipulate the latent variable directly. However, existing approaches for performing such manipulations (e.g. interpolation or forming low-dimensional representations) only work well in special cases or are network or data-modality specific.
We propose Latent Optimal Linear combinations (LOL) as a general-purpose method to form linear combinations of latent variables that adhere to the assumptions of the generative model. As LOL is easy to implement and naturally addresses the broader task of forming any linear combinations, e.g. the construction of subspaces of the latent space, LOL dramatically simplifies the creation of expressive low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional objects. Erik Bodin, Alexandru I. Stere, Dragos D. Margineantu, Carl Henrik Ek, Henry Moss |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Verification of Semantic Key Point Detection for Aircraft Pose EstimationabstractWe analyse Semantic Segmentation Neural Networks running on an autonomous aircraft to estimate its 6DOF pose during landing. We show that automated reasoning techniques from neural network verification can be used to analyse the conditions under which the networks can operate safely, thus providing enhanced assurance guarantees on the behaviour of the overall pose estimation systems. Panagiotis Kouvaros, Francesco Leofante, Blake Edwards, Calvin Chung, Dragos D. Margineantu, Alessio Lomuscio |
KR | 5 |
| 2023 | Guest Editorial: Special issue on robust machine learning
Ransalu Senanayake, Daniel J. Fremont, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Alessio Lomuscio, Dragos D. Margineantu, Cheng Soon Ong |
Mach. Learn. | 5 |
| 2021 | Formal Analysis of Neural Network-Based Systems in the Aircraft Domain
Panagiotis Kouvaros, Trent Kyono, Francesco Leofante, Alessio Lomuscio, Dragos D. Margineantu, Denis Osipychev, Yang Zheng 0001 |
FM | 5 |
| 2020 | Formal Analysis and Redesign of a Neural Network-Based Aircraft Taxiing System with VerifAIabstractWe demonstrate a unified approach to rigorous design of safety-critical autonomous systems using the VerifAI toolkit for formal analysis of AI-based systems. VerifAI provides an integrated toolchain for tasks spanning the design process, including modeling, falsification, debugging, and ML component retraining. We evaluate all of these applications in an industrial case study on an experimental autonomous aircraft taxiing system developed by Boeing, which uses a neural network to track the centerline of a runway. We define runway scenarios using the Scenic probabilistic programming language, and use them to drive tests in the X-Plane flight simulator. We first perform falsification, automatically finding environment conditions causing the system to violate its specification by deviating significantly from the centerline (or even leaving the runway entirely). Next, we use counterexample analysis to identify distinct failure cases, and confirm their root causes with specialized testing. Finally, we use the results of falsification and debugging to retrain the network, eliminating several failure cases and improving the overall performance of the closed-loop system. Daniel J. Fremont, Johnathan Chiu, Dragos D. Margineantu, Denis Osipychev, Sanjit A. Seshia |
CAV (1) | 3 |
| 2010 | Machine learning algorithms for event detection
Dragos D. Margineantu, Weng-Keen Wong, Denver Dash |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2005 | Active Cost-Sensitive Learning
Dragos D. Margineantu |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Testing decision systems with classification componentsabstractMany decision tools and complex decision systems require components that use learning technology to improve the quality of the decisions, based on observations (such as sensor data). In order to employ these tools and systems in high- or medium-risk applications, the design, implementation, and deployment process needs to follow principled verification, validation, and testing procedures that assure a reliable operation. This task is far from being trivial because of the very nature of learning - a technology that provides tools for making decisions under uncertainty. Only little research efforts have been dedicated so far to validating and testing learning-based systems. This paper describes a novel tool for the testing and the validation of learning systems and a set of statistical tests that are employed by this tool for the assessment of learned classification decisions. We also describe some aspects of the underlying theoretical and experimental framework for the validation and testing of systems that learn. Dragos D. Margineantu, Michael Drumheller, Roman D. Fresnedo |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2002 | Class Probability Estimation and Cost-Sensitive Classification Decisions
Dragos D. Margineantu |
ECML | 1 |
| 2000 | Bootstrap Methods for the Cost-Sensitive Evaluation of Classifiers
Dragos D. Margineantu, Thomas G. Dietterich |
ICML | 1 |
| 1997 | Pruning Adaptive Boosting
Dragos D. Margineantu, Thomas G. Dietterich |
ICML | 1 |