Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bernard Penz

dblp:34/6251 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-2375-9349ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › branch-and-bound
branch-and-price
0.212016
A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Scheduling Observations on a Telescope · IJCAI 2016
Mathematical optimization
constraint programming
0.212016
Alternative Filtering for the Weighted Circuit Constraint: Comparing Lower Bounds for the TSP and Solving TSPTW · AAAI 2016
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.212016
A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Scheduling Observations on a Telescope · IJCAI 2016
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem
0.212016
Alternative Filtering for the Weighted Circuit Constraint: Comparing Lower Bounds for the TSP and Solving TSPTW · AAAI 2016
Mathematical optimization
scheduling
0.112016
A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Scheduling Observations on a Telescope · IJCAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound · 0.2cost-based filtering · 0.2column generation · 0.2branch-and-bound · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Alternative Filtering for the Weighted Circuit Constraint: Comparing Lower Bounds for the TSP and Solving TSPTW
abstract
Many problems, and in particular routing problems, require to find one or many circuits in a weighted graph. The weights often express the distance or the travel time between vertices. We propose in this paper various filtering algorithms for the weighted circuit constraint which maintain a circuit in a weighted graph. The filtering algorithms are typical cost based filtering algorithms relying on relaxations of the Traveling Salesman Problem. We investigate three bounds and show that they are incomparable. In particular we design a filtering algorithm based on a lower bound introduced in 1981 by Christophides et al.. This bound can provide stronger filtering than the classical Held and Karp’s approach when additional information, such as the possible positions of the clients in the tour, is available. This is particularly suited for problems with side constraints such as time windows.
Sylvain Ducomman, Hadrien Cambazard, Bernard Penz
AAAI3
2016 A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Scheduling Observations on a Telescope
Nicolas Catusse, Hadrien Cambazard, Nadia Brauner, Pierre Lemaire 0001, Bernard Penz, Anne-Marie Lagrange, Pascal Rubini
IJCAI5
2013 Large-scale standard pooling problems with constrained pools and fixed demands
Olivier Briant, Jean-Maurice Clochard, Bernard Penz
J. Glob. Optim.4
2012 A Constraint Programming Approach for the Traveling Purchaser Problem
Hadrien Cambazard, Bernard Penz
CP2
2011 Module Selection and Supply Chain Optimization for Customized Product Families Using Redundancy and Standardization
abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of configuring a product family which has to satisfy diversified customer requirements. Modular design strategies allow a bill of materials to be generated for various finished products from a limited subset of modules. Simultaneously, a production location must be selected for the manufacture of each module. From a product point-of-view, the strategies adopted are often extreme, proposing either the manufacturing of the total diversity (all possible products) or a limited set of standardized products (only a few products are proposed). The objective of this paper is to investigate intermediate cases on this continuum, in order to better understand the potential for profit. Our comparison is based on the product family configuration (selection of the best modules) that minimizes production and transportation costs under time constraints.
Radwan El Hadj Khalaf, Bruno Agard, Bernard Penz
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng.3