Compiler-based auto-parallelization is a much-studied area but has yet to find widespread application. This is largely due to the poor identification and exploitation of application parallelism, resulting in disappointing performance far below that which a skilled expert programmer could achieve. We have identified two weaknesses in traditional parallelizing compilers and propose a novel, integrated approach resulting in significant performance improvements of the generated parallel code. Using profile-driven parallelism detection, we overcome the limitations of static analysis, enabling the identification of more application parallelism, and only rely on the user for final approval. We then replace the traditional target-specific and inflexible mapping heuristics with a machine-learning-based prediction mechanism, resulting in better mapping decisions while automating adaptation to different target architectures. We have evaluated our parallelization strategy on the NAS and SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks and two different multicore platforms (dual quad-core Intel Xeon SMP and dual-socket QS20 Cell blade). We demonstrate that our approach not only yields significant improvements when compared with state-of-the-art parallelizing compilers but also comes close to and sometimes exceeds the performance of manually parallelized codes. On average, our methodology achieves 96% of the performance of the hand-tuned OpenMP NAS and SPEC parallel benchmarks on the Intel Xeon platform and gains a significant speedup for the IBM Cell platform, demonstrating the potential of profile-guided and machine-learning- based parallelization for complex multicore platforms.

In recent years multi-core computer systems have left the realm of high-performance computing and virtually all of today's desktop computers and embedded computing systems are equipped with several processing cores. Still, no single parallel programming model has found widespread support and parallel programming remains an art for the majority of application programmers. In addition, there exists a plethora of sequential legacy applications for which automatic parallelization is the only hope to benefit from the increased processing power of modern multi-core systems. In the past automatic parallelization largely focused on data parallelism. In this paper we present a novel approach to extracting and exploiting pipeline parallelism from sequential applications. We use profiling to overcome the limitations of static data and control flow analysis enabling more aggressive parallelization. Our approach is orthogonal to existing automatic parallelization approaches and additional data parallelism may be exploited in the individual pipeline stages. The key contribution of this paper is a whole-program representation that supports profiling, parallelism extraction and exploitation. We demonstrate how this enhances conventional pipeline parallelization by incorporating support for multi-level loops and pipeline stage replication in a uniform and automatic way. We have evaluated our methodology on a set of multimedia and stream processing benchmarks and demonstrate speedups of up to 4.7 on a eight-core Intel Xeon machine.

Compiler-based auto-parallelization is a much studied area, yet has still not found wide-spread application. This is largely due to the poor exploitation of application parallelism, subsequently resulting in performance levels far below those which a skilled expert programmer could achieve. We have identified two weaknesses in traditional parallelizing compilers and propose a novel, integrated approach, resulting in significant performance improvements of the generated parallel code. Using profile-driven parallelism detection we overcome the limitations of static analysis, enabling us to identify more application parallelism and only rely on the user for final approval. In addition, we replace the traditional target-specific and inflexible mapping heuristics with a machine-learning based prediction mechanism, resulting in better mapping decisions while providing more scope for adaptation to different target architectures. We have evaluated our parallelization strategy against the NAS and SPEC OMP benchmarks and two different multi-core platforms (dual quad-core Intel Xeon SMP and dual-socket QS20 Cell blade). We demonstrate that our approach not only yields significant improvements when compared with state-of-the-art parallelizing compilers, but comes close to and sometimes exceeds the performance of manually parallelized codes. On average, our methodology achieves 96% of the performance of the hand-tuned OpenMP NAS and SPEC parallel benchmarks on the Intel Xeon platform and gains a significant speedup for the IBM Cell platform, demonstrating the potential of profile-guided and machine-learning based parallelization for complex multi-core platforms.