Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Yinon Oshrat

dblp:34/7115 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 56% Reinforcement learning · 44%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Games and playful interaction · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
agent evaluation
0.112010
Facilitating the Evaluation of Automated Negotiators using Peer Designed Agents · AAAI 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
automated negotiation
0.112010
Facilitating the Evaluation of Automated Negotiators using Peer Designed Agents · AAAI 2010
Computer animation and physical simulation
motion capture
0.112010
Enhanced interactive gaming by blending full-body tracking and gesture animation · SIGGRAPH ASIA (Sketches) 2010
Computer animation and physical simulation
motion editing
0.112010
Enhanced interactive gaming by blending full-body tracking and gesture animation · SIGGRAPH ASIA (Sketches) 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › human-agent interaction
human-AI decision making
0.012010
Facilitating the Evaluation of Automated Negotiators using Peer Designed Agents · AAAI 2010
Games and playful interaction
interactive gaming
0.012010
Enhanced interactive gaming by blending full-body tracking and gesture animation · SIGGRAPH ASIA (Sketches) 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gesture animation · 0.2depth sensing · 0.2empirical study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Facilitating the Evaluation of Automated Negotiators using Peer Designed Agents
abstract
Computer agents are increasingly deployed in settings in which they make decisions with people, such as electronic commerce, collaborative interfaces, and cognitive assistants. However, the scientific evaluation of computational strategies for human-computer decision-making is a costly process, involving time, effort and personnel. This paper investigates the use of Peer Designed Agents (PDA) — computer agents developed by human subjects — as a tool for facilitating the evaluation process of automatic negotiators that were developed by researchers. It compared the performance between automatic negotiators that interacted with PDAs to automatic negotiators that interacted with actual people in different domains. The experiments included more than 300 human subjects and 50 PDAs developed by students. Results showed that the automatic negotiators outperformed PDAs in the same situations in which they outperformed people, and that on average, they exhibited the same measure of generosity towards their negotiation partners. These patterns were significant for all types of domains, and for all types of automated negotiators, despite the fact that there were individual differences between the behavior of PDAs and people. The study thus provides an empirical proof that PDAs can alleviate the evaluation process of automatic negotiators, and facilitate their design.
Raz Lin, Sarit Kraus, Yinon Oshrat, Kobi Gal
AAAI3
2010 Enhanced interactive gaming by blending full-body tracking and gesture animation
abstract
Animating in-game avatars using real time motion capture data is highly appealing and is becoming more widespread due to the accessibility of researchers and developers to consumer priced depth sensors [Microsoft Kinect 2010]. Depth sensors allow for a cheap and robust motion capture solution which can be naturally adapted to games. However, in spite of the many advantages of using real-time motion capture data for animating avatars in games, there are two major challenges. The first is due to the limitations of the current tracking techniques in producing smooth, noise free, accurate animation in real-time. The second, and more acute problem, stems from the fact that in most games, the movements of the animated avatar are expected to be more expressive than the player's actual movements. In such cases, one would like to visually enhance the player's motion to display exaggerated or even super-natural motions.
Amit Bleiweiss, Dagan Eshar, Gershom Kutliroff, Alon Lerner, Yinon Oshrat, Yaron Yanai
SIGGRAPH ASIA (Sketches)5