Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeffery Li

dblp:34/7647 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-7000-1417ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 77% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
environment modeling
0.612022
DRG: A Dynamic Relation Graph for Unified Prior-Online Environment Modeling in Urban Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › agent planning
action planning
0.212022
DRG: A Dynamic Relation Graph for Unified Prior-Online Environment Modeling in Urban Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relational mapping · 0.6graph-based modeling · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Tetris with few piece types
Erik D. Demaine, Holden Hall, Jeffery Li
Theor. Comput. Sci.4
2022 DRG: A Dynamic Relation Graph for Unified Prior-Online Environment Modeling in Urban Autonomous Driving
abstract
Environment modeling is the backbone of how autonomous agents understand the world, and therefore has significant implications for decision-making and verification. Motivated by the success of relational mapping tools such as Lanelet2, we present the Dynamic Relation Graph (DRG). The DRG is a novel method for extending prior relational maps to include online observations, creating a unified en-vironment model which incorporates both prior and online data sources. Our prototype implementation models a finite set of heterogeneous features including road signage and pedestrian movement. However, the methodology behind the DRG can be expanded to a wider range of features in a fashion that does not increase the complexity of behavioral planning. Simulated stress tests indicate the DRG's effectiveness in decreasing decision-making complexity, and deployment on the University of Waterloo's WATonomous research vehicle demonstrates its practical utility. The prototype code will be released at github.com/WATonomous/DRG.
Rowan Dempster, Mohammad K. Al-Sharman, Yeshu Jain, Jeffery Li, Derek Rayside, William W. Melek
ICRA4
2015 Using epigenomics data to predict gene expression in lung cancer
abstract
BACKGROUND: Epigenetic alterations are known to correlate with changes in gene expression among various diseases including cancers. However, quantitative models that accurately predict the up or down regulation of gene expression are currently lacking. METHODS: A new machine learning-based method of gene expression prediction is developed in the context of lung cancer. This method uses the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450K Beadchip CpG methylation array data from paired lung cancer and adjacent normal tissues in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and histone modification marker CHIP-Seq data from the ENCODE project, to predict the differential expression of RNA-Seq data in TCGA lung cancers. It considers a comprehensive list of 1424 features spanning the four categories of CpG methylation, histone H3 methylation modification, nucleotide composition, and conservation. Various feature selection and classification methods are compared to select the best model over 10-fold cross-validation in the training data set. RESULTS: A best model comprising 67 features is chosen by ReliefF based feature selection and random forest classification method, with AUC = 0.864 from the 10-fold cross-validation of the training set and AUC = 0.836 from the testing set. The selected features cover all four data types, with histone H3 methylation modification (32 features) and CpG methylation (15 features) being most abundant. Among the dropping-off tests of individual data-type based features, removal of CpG methylation feature leads to the most reduction in model performance. In the best model, 19 selected features are from the promoter regions (TSS200 and TSS1500), highest among all locations relative to transcripts. Sequential dropping-off of CpG methylation features relative to different regions on the protein coding transcripts shows that promoter regions contribute most significantly to the accurate prediction of gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: By considering a comprehensive list of epigenomic and genomic features, we have constructed an accurate model to predict transcriptomic differential expression, exemplified in lung cancer.
Jeffery Li, Travers Ching, Sijia Huang, Lana X. Garmire
BMC Bioinform.1