Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matteo Tonelli
dblp:34/8797
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 92% Computational complexity · 8% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division |
1.2 | 3 | 2021 | On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2021 On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2019 On Social Envy-Freeness in Multi-Unit Markets · AAAI 2018 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › market design
multi-unit markets |
1.2 | 3 | 2021 | On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2021 On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2019 On Social Envy-Freeness in Multi-Unit Markets · AAAI 2018 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › pricing
price discrimination |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division
envy-freeness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2019 |
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets · IJCAI 2018 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › pricing
pricing mechanism |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets · IJCAI 2018 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
welfare maximization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
social relationship graph · 0.3approximation algorithm · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2020 | Inequity Aversion Pricing in Multi-Unit MarketsabstractWe build upon previous models for differential pricing in social networks and fair price discrimination in markets, considering a setting in which multiple units of a single product must be sold to selected buyers so as to maximize the seller's revenue or the social welfare, while limiting the differences of the prices offered to social neighbors. We first consider the case of general social graph topologies, and provide optimal or nearly-optimal hardness and approximation results for the related optimization problems under various meaningful assumptions, including the inapproximability within any constant factor on the achievable revenue under the unique game conjecture. Then, we focus on topologies that are typical of social networks. Namely, we consider graphs where the node degrees follow a power-law distribution, and show that it is possible to obtain constant or good approximations for the seller's revenue maximization with high probability, thus improving upon the general case. Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli, Cosimo Vinci |
ECAI | 3 |
| 2019 | On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2018 | On Social Envy-Freeness in Multi-Unit Markets
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2018 | On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit MarketsabstractDiscriminatory pricing policies, even if at first glance can be perceived as unfair, are widespread. In fact, pricing differences for the same item among different national markets are common, or forms of discrimination based on the time of purchase, like in tickets' sales. In this work we propose a framework for capturing the setting of ``fair'' discriminatory pricing and study its application to multi-unit markets, in which many copies of the same item are on sale. Our model is able to incorporate the fundamental discrimination settings proposed in the literature, by expressing individual buyers constraints for assigning prices by means of a social relationship graph, modeling the information that each buyer can acquire about the prices assigned to the other buyers. After pointing out the positive effects of fair price discrimination, we investigate the computational complexity of maximizing the social welfare and the revenue in these markets, providing hardness and approximation results under various assumptions on the buyers valuations and on the social graph topology. Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli |
IJCAI | 3 |