Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matteo Tonelli

dblp:34/8797 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 92% Computational complexity · 8%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division
1.232021
On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2021
On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2019
On Social Envy-Freeness in Multi-Unit Markets · AAAI 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › market design
multi-unit markets
1.232021
On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2021
On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2019
On Social Envy-Freeness in Multi-Unit Markets · AAAI 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › pricing
price discrimination
0.512021
On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division
envy-freeness
0.412019
On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets · Artif. Intell. 2019
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation
0.312018
On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets · IJCAI 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › pricing
pricing mechanism
0.312018
On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets · IJCAI 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
welfare maximization
0.112018
On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets · IJCAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

social relationship graph · 0.3approximation algorithm · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 On fair price discrimination in multi-unit markets
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli
Artif. Intell.3
2020 Inequity Aversion Pricing in Multi-Unit Markets
abstract
We build upon previous models for differential pricing in social networks and fair price discrimination in markets, considering a setting in which multiple units of a single product must be sold to selected buyers so as to maximize the seller's revenue or the social welfare, while limiting the differences of the prices offered to social neighbors. We first consider the case of general social graph topologies, and provide optimal or nearly-optimal hardness and approximation results for the related optimization problems under various meaningful assumptions, including the inapproximability within any constant factor on the achievable revenue under the unique game conjecture. Then, we focus on topologies that are typical of social networks. Namely, we consider graphs where the node degrees follow a power-law distribution, and show that it is possible to obtain constant or good approximations for the seller's revenue maximization with high probability, thus improving upon the general case.
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli, Cosimo Vinci
ECAI3
2019 On social envy-freeness in multi-unit markets
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli
Artif. Intell.3
2018 On Social Envy-Freeness in Multi-Unit Markets
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli
AAAI3
2018 On Fair Price Discrimination in Multi-Unit Markets
abstract
Discriminatory pricing policies, even if at first glance can be perceived as unfair, are widespread. In fact, pricing differences for the same item among different national markets are common, or forms of discrimination based on the time of purchase, like in tickets' sales. In this work we propose a framework for capturing the setting of ``fair'' discriminatory pricing and study its application to multi-unit markets, in which many copies of the same item are on sale. Our model is able to incorporate the fundamental discrimination settings proposed in the literature, by expressing individual buyers constraints for assigning prices by means of a social relationship graph, modeling the information that each buyer can acquire about the prices assigned to the other buyers. After pointing out the positive effects of fair price discrimination, we investigate the computational complexity of maximizing the social welfare and the revenue in these markets, providing hardness and approximation results under various assumptions on the buyers valuations and on the social graph topology.
Michele Flammini, Manuel Mauro, Matteo Tonelli
IJCAI3