Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charles Dossal

dblp:34/9061 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 88% Information theory · 12%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence acceleration
momentum acceleration
0.912025
Gradient correlation is a key ingredient to accelerate SGD with momentum · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.912025
Gradient correlation is a key ingredient to accelerate SGD with momentum · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.912025
Gradient correlation is a key ingredient to accelerate SGD with momentum · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › regularization
sparse regularization
0.212013
Robust Sparse Analysis Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
support recovery
0.212013
Robust Sparse Analysis Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013
Mathematical optimization › regularization
total variation
0.212013
Robust Sparse Analysis Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

strong growth condition · 1.7momentum · 1.7SGD · 1.7l1-analysis regularization · 0.2convex optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Gradient correlation is a key ingredient to accelerate SGD with momentum
abstract
Empirically, it has been observed that adding momentum to Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) accelerates the convergence of the algorithm. However, the literature has been rather pessimistic, even in the case of convex functions, about the possibility of theoretically proving this observation. We investigate the possibility of obtaining accelerated convergence of the Stochastic Nesterov Accelerated Gradient (SNAG), a momentum-based version of SGD, when minimizing a sum of functions in a convex setting. We demonstrate that the average correlation between gradients allows to verify the strong growth condition, which is the key ingredient to obtain acceleration with SNAG. Numerical experiments, both in linear regression and deep neural network optimization, confirm in practice our theoretical results.
Julien Hermant, Marien Renaud, Jean-François Aujol, Charles Dossal, Aude Rondepierre
ICLR4
2013 Robust Sparse Analysis Regularization
abstract
This paper investigates the theoretical guarantees of$\ell^{1}$-analysis regularization when solving linear inverse problems. Most of previous works in the literature have mainly focused on the sparse synthesis prior where the sparsity is measured as the$\ell^{1}$norm of the coefficients that synthesize the signal from a given dictionary. In contrast, the more general analysis regularization minimizes the$\ell^{1}$norm of the correlations between the signal and the atoms in the dictionary, where these correlations define the analysis support. The corresponding variational problem encompasses several well-known regularizations such as the discrete total variation and the fused Lasso. Our main contributions consist in deriving sufficient conditions that guarantee exact or partial analysis support recovery of the true signal in presence of noise. More precisely, we give a sufficient condition to ensure that a signal is the unique solution of the$\ell^{1}$-analysis regularization in the noiseless case. The same condition also guarantees exact analysis support recovery and$\ell^{2}$-robustness of the$\ell^{1}$-analysis minimizer vis-à-vis an enough small noise in the measurements. This condition turns to be sharp for the robustness of the sign pattern. To show partial support recovery and$\ell^{2}$-robustness to an arbitrary bounded noise, we introduce a stronger sufficient condition. When specialized to the$\ell^{1}$-synthesis regularization, our results recover some corresponding recovery and robustness guarantees previously known in the literature. From this perspective, our work is a generalization of these results. We finally illustrate these theoretical findings on several examples to study the robustness of the 1-D total variation, shift-invariant Haar dictionary, and fused Lasso regularizations.
Samuel Vaiter, Gabriel Peyré, Charles Dossal, Mohamed-Jalal Fadili
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
2012 Unbiased risk estimation for sparse analysis regularization
abstract
In this paper, we propose a rigorous derivation of the expression of the projected Generalized Stein Unbiased Risk Estimator (GSURE) for the estimation of the (projected) risk associated to regularized ill-posed linear inverse problems using sparsity-promoting ℓ1penalty. The projected GSURE is an unbiased estimator of the recovery risk on the vector projected on the orthogonal of the degradation operator kernel. Our framework can handle many well-known regularizations including sparse synthesis- (e.g. wavelet) and analysis-type priors (e.g. total variation). A distinctive novelty of this work is that, unlike previously proposed ℓ1risk estimators, we have a closed-form expression that can be implemented efficiently once the solution of the inverse problem is computed. To support our claims, numerical examples on ill-posed inverse problems with analysis and synthesis regularizations are reported where our GSURE estimates are used to tune the regularization parameter.
Charles-Alban Deledalle, Samuel Vaiter, Gabriel Peyré, Mohamed-Jalal Fadili, Charles Dossal
ICIP5
2011 Bandlet image estimation with model selection
Charles Dossal, Erwan Le Pennec, Stéphane Mallat
Signal Process.1