EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dejan Slepcev
dblp:34/9226
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7600-1144ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 36% Optimization for machine learning · 36% Learning paradigms · 28% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 86% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 52% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 40% Mathematical optimization · 8% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accurate Quantization of Measures via Interacting Particle-based Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
interacting particle systems |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accurate Quantization of Measures via Interacting Particle-based Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accurate Quantization of Measures via Interacting Particle-based Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient flow
wasserstein gradient flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Accurate Quantization of Measures via Interacting Particle-based Optimization · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
graph-based semi-supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label Rates · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label Rates · ICML 2020 |
Geometric modeling and processing › discrete geometry › discrete differential geometry
cone singularity |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Optimal cone singularities for conformal flattening · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Geometric modeling and processing › discrete geometry
discrete differential geometry |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Optimal cone singularities for conformal flattening · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface parameterization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Optimal cone singularities for conformal flattening · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
ratio cut |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › nonlinear dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum mean discrepancy · 0.6kernel stein discrepancy · 0.6kernel herding · 0.6poisson learning · 0.4laplacian learning · 0.4graph cuts · 0.4linear optimal transportation · 0.3fenchel-rockafellar duality · 0.3cotangent laplacian · 0.3convex optimization · 0.3spectral graph theory · 0.2consistency analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Accurate Quantization of Measures via Interacting Particle-based OptimizationabstractApproximating a target probability distribution can be cast as an optimization problem where the objective functional measures the dissimilarity to the target. This optimization can be addressed by approximating Wasserstein and related gradient flows. In practice, these are simulated by interacting particle systems, whose stationary states define an empirical measure approximating the target distribution. This approach has been popularized recently to design sampling algorithms, e.g. Stein Variational Gradient Descent, or by minimizing the Maximum Mean or Kernel Stein Discrepancy. However, little is known about quantization properties of these approaches, i.e. how well is the target approximated by a finite number particles. We investigate this question theoretically and numerically. In particular, we prove general upper bounds on the quantization error of MMD and KSD at rates which significantly outperform quantization by i.i.d. samples. We conduct experiments which show that the particle systems at study achieve fast rates in practice, and notably outperform greedy algorithms, such as kernel herding. We compare different gradient flows and highlight their quantization rates. Furthermore we introduce a Normalized Stein Variational Gradient Descent and argue in favor of adaptive kernels, which exhibit faster convergence. Finally we compare the Gaussian and Laplace kernels and argue that the Laplace kernel provides a more robust quantization. Anna Korba, Dejan Slepcev |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label RatesabstractWe propose a new framework, called Poisson learning, for graph based semi-supervised learning at very low label rates. Poisson learning is motivated by the need to address the degeneracy of Laplacian semi-supervised learning in this regime. The method replaces the assignment of label values at training points with the placement of sources and sinks, and solves the resulting Poisson equation on the graph. The outcomes are provably more stable and informative than those of Laplacian learning. Poisson learning is efficient and simple to implement, and we present numerical experiments showing the method is superior to other recent approaches to semi-supervised learning at low label rates on MNIST, FashionMNIST, and Cifar-10. We also propose a graph-cut enhancement of Poisson learning, called Poisson MBO, that gives higher accuracy and can incorporate prior knowledge of relative class sizes. Jeff Calder, Brendan Cook, Matthew Thorpe, Dejan Slepcev |
ICML | 4 |
| 2018 | Optimal cone singularities for conformal flatteningabstractAngle-preserving or conformal surface parameterization has proven to be a powerful tool across applications ranging from geometry processing, to digital manufacturing, to machine learning, yet conformal maps can still suffer from severe area distortion. Cone singularities provide a way to mitigate this distortion, but finding the best configuration of cones is notoriously difficult. This paper develops a strategy that is globally optimal in the sense that it minimizes total area distortion among all possible cone configurations (number, placement, and size) that have no more than a fixed total cone angle. A key insight is that, for the purpose of optimization, one should not work directly with curvature measures (which naturally represent cone configurations), but can instead apply Fenchel-Rockafellar duality to obtain a formulation involving only ordinary functions. The result is a convex optimization problem, which can be solved via a sequence of sparse linear systems easily built from the usual cotangent Laplacian. The method supports user-defined notions of importance, constraints on cone angles ( e.g. , positive, or within a given range), and sophisticated boundary conditions ( e.g. , convex, or polygonal). We compare our approach to previous techniques on a variety of challenging models, often achieving dramatically lower distortion, and demonstrating that global optimality leads to extreme robustness in the presence of noise or poor discretization. Yousuf Soliman, Dejan Slepcev, Keenan Crane |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2016 | Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph CutsabstractThis paper establishes the consistency of a family of graph-cut- based algorithms for clustering of data clouds. We consider point clouds obtained as samples of a ground-truth measure. We investigate approaches to clustering based on minimizing objective functionals defined on proximity graphs of the given sample. Our focus is on functionals based on graph cuts like the Cheeger and ratio cuts. We show that minimizers of these cuts converge as the sample size increases to a minimizer of a corresponding continuum cut (which partitions the ground truth measure). Moreover, we obtain sharp conditions on how the connectivity radius can be scaled with respect to the number of sample points for the consistency to hold. We provide results for two-way and for multiway cuts. Furthermore we provide numerical experiments that illustrate the results and explore the optimality of scaling in dimension two. Nicolás García Trillos, Dejan Slepcev, James H. von Brecht, Thomas Laurent 0001, Xavier Bresson |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2013 | A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images
Wei Wang 0037, Dejan Slepcev, Saurav Basu, John A. Ozolek, Gustavo K. Rohde |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |
| 2011 | An Optimal Transportation Approach for Nuclear Structure-Based PathologyabstractNuclear morphology and structure as visualized from histopathology microscopy images can yield important diagnostic clues in some benign and malignant tissue lesions. Precise quantitative information about nuclear structure and morphology, however, is currently not available for many diagnostic challenges. This is due, in part, to the lack of methods to quantify these differences from image data. We describe a method to characterize and contrast the distribution of nuclear structure in different tissue classes (normal, benign, cancer, etc.). The approach is based on quantifying chromatin morphology in different groups of cells using the optimal transportation (Kantorovich-Wasserstein) metric in combination with the Fisher discriminant analysis and multidimensional scaling techniques. We show that the optimal transportation metric is able to measure relevant biological information as it enables automatic determination of the class (e.g., normal versus cancer) of a set of nuclei. We show that the classification accuracies obtained using this metric are, on average, as good or better than those obtained utilizing a set of previously described numerical features. We apply our methods to two diagnostic challenges for surgical pathology: one in the liver and one in the thyroid. Results automatically computed using this technique show potentially biologically relevant differences in nuclear structure in liver and thyroid cancers. Wei Wang 0037, John A. Ozolek, Dejan Slepcev, Ann B. Lee, Cheng Chen 0003, Gustavo K. Rohde |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 3 |