Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andreas Radler

dblp:340/2232 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › implicit neural representation
neural field
0.912025
Geometry-Informed Neural Networks · ICML 2025
Visual content generation and editing
3d shape generation
0.912025
Geometry-Informed Neural Networks · ICML 2025
Geometric modeling and processing › computer-aided design
generative design
0.912025
Geometry-Informed Neural Networks · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural field · 1.7constraint-based training · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Geometry-Informed Neural Networks
abstract
Geometry is a ubiquitous tool in computer graphics, design, and engineering. However, the lack of large shape datasets limits the application of state-of-the-art supervised learning methods and motivates the exploration of alternative learning strategies. To this end, we introduce geometry-informed neural networks (GINNs) -- a framework for training shape-generative neural fields without data by leveraging user-specified design requirements in the form of objectives and constraints. By adding diversity as an explicit constraint, GINNs avoid mode-collapse and can generate multiple diverse solutions, often required in geometry tasks. Experimentally, we apply GINNs to several problems spanning physics, geometry, and engineering design, showing control over geometrical and topological properties, such as surface smoothness or the number of holes. These results demonstrate the potential of training shape-generative models without data, paving the way for new generative design approaches without large datasets.
Arturs Berzins, Andreas Radler, Eric Volkmann, Sebastian Sanokowski, Sepp Hochreiter, Johannes Brandstetter
ICML2