Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cosimo Gregucci

dblp:340/4127 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9636-0996ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Question answering and dialogue systems · 28% Graph learning · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge base question answering
complex question answering
0.912025
Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex? · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph reasoning
0.912025
Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex? · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.712023
Link Prediction with Attention Applied on Multiple Knowledge Graph Embedding Models · WWW 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph embedding
0.712023
Link Prediction with Attention Applied on Multiple Knowledge Graph Embedding Models · WWW 2023
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding
0.712023
Link Prediction with Attention Applied on Multiple Knowledge Graph Embedding Models · WWW 2023
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.712023
Link Prediction with Attention Applied on Multiple Knowledge Graph Embedding Models · WWW 2023
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph querying
0.312025
Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex? · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-hop reasoning · 1.7link prediction · 1.7poincaré ball embedding · 1.3attention mechanism · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex?
abstract
Complex query answering (CQA) on knowledge graphs (KGs) is gaining momentum as a challenging reasoning task. In this paper, we show that the current benchmarks for CQA might not be as complex as we think, as the way they are built distorts our perception of progress in this field. For example, we find that in these benchmarks most queries (up to 98% for some query types) can be reduced to simpler problems, e.g., link prediction, where only one link needs to be predicted. The performance of state-of-the-art CQA models decreses significantly when such models are evaluated on queries that cannot be reduced to easier types. Thus, we propose a set of more challenging benchmarks composed of queries that require models to reason over multiple hops and better reflect the construction of real-world KGs. In a systematic empirical investigation, the new benchmarks show that current methods leave much to be desired from current CQA methods.
Cosimo Gregucci, Bo Xiong 0001, Daniel Hernández 0002, Lorenzo Loconte, Pasquale Minervini, Steffen Staab, Antonio Vergari
ICML1
2023 Link Prediction with Attention Applied on Multiple Knowledge Graph Embedding Models
abstract
Predicting missing links between entities in a knowledge graph is a fundamental task to deal with the incompleteness of data on the Web. Knowledge graph embeddings map nodes into a vector space to predict new links, scoring them according to geometric criteria. Relations in the graph may follow patterns that can be learned, e.g., some relations might be symmetric and others might be hierarchical. However, the learning capability of different embedding models varies for each pattern and, so far, no single model can learn all patterns equally well. In this paper, we combine the query representations from several models in a unified one to incorporate patterns that are independently captured by each model. Our combination uses attention to select the most suitable model to answer each query. The models are also mapped onto a non-Euclidean manifold, the Poincaré ball, to capture structural patterns, such as hierarchies, besides relational patterns, such as symmetry. We prove that our combination provides a higher expressiveness and inference power than each model on its own. As a result, the combined model can learn relational and structural patterns. We conduct extensive experimental analysis with various link prediction benchmarks showing that the combined model outperforms individual models, including state-of-the-art approaches.
Cosimo Gregucci, Mojtaba Nayyeri, Daniel Hernández 0002, Steffen Staab
WWW1