Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Janine R. Hutchison

dblp:340/5280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-9303-5290ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis
0.712023
MS1Connect: a mass spectrometry run similarity measure · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.712023
MS1Connect: a mass spectrometry run similarity measure · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
species identification
0.212023
MS1Connect: a mass spectrometry run similarity measure · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

MS1 scan comparison · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 MS1Connect: a mass spectrometry run similarity measure
abstract
MOTIVATION: Interpretation of newly acquired mass spectrometry data can be improved by identifying, from an online repository, previous mass spectrometry runs that resemble the new data. However, this retrieval task requires computing the similarity between an arbitrary pair of mass spectrometry runs. This is particularly challenging for runs acquired using different experimental protocols. RESULTS: We propose a method, MS1Connect, that calculates the similarity between a pair of runs by examining only the intact peptide (MS1) scans, and we show evidence that the MS1Connect score is accurate. Specifically, we show that MS1Connect outperforms several baseline methods on the task of predicting the species from which a given proteomics sample originated. In addition, we show that MS1Connect scores are highly correlated with similarities computed from fragment (MS2) scans, even though these data are not used by MS1Connect. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The MS1Connect software is available at https://github.com/bmx8177/MS1Connect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Andy Lin, Brooke L. Deatherage Kaiser, Janine R. Hutchison, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble
Bioinform.3