Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chenxuanyin Zou
dblp:340/5443
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7439-3551ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
differentiable decision tree |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
warm-start annealing · 0.9softmin approximation · 0.9ReLU+Argmin reformulation · 0.9GPU parallelism · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" ReformulationabstractDecision tree, despite its unmatched interpretability and lightweight structure, faces two key issues that limit its broader applicability: non-differentiability and low testing accuracy.
This study addresses these issues by developing a differentiable oblique tree that optimizes the entire tree using gradient-based optimization. We propose an exact reformulation of hard-split trees based on "ReLU+Argmin" mechanism, and then cast the reformulated tree training as an unconstrained optimization task.
The ReLU-based sample branching, expressed as exact-zero or non-zero values, preserve a unique decision path, in contrast to soft decision trees with probabilistic routing. The subsequent Argmin operation identifies the unique zero-violation path, enabling deterministic predictions.
For effective gradient flow, we approximate Argmin behaviors by scaling softmin function. To ameliorate numerical instability, we propose a warm-start annealing scheme that solves multiple optimization tasks with increasingly accurate approximations.
This reformulation alongside distributed GPU parallelism offers strong scalability, supporting 12-depth tree even on million-scale datasets where most baselines fail.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that our optimized tree achieves a superior testing accuracy against 14 baselines, including an average improvement of 7.54\% over CART. Qiangqiang Mao, Jiayang Ren, Yixiu Wang, Chenxuanyin Zou, Yankai Cao |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | Multiobjective Dynamic Optimization of Nonlinear Systems With Path ConstraintsabstractIn this article, two algorithms are proposed to solve multiobjective path-constrained dynamic optimization problems. In each algorithm, an adaptive$\varepsilon $-constraint method is employed to solve the multiobjective dynamic optimization problems (MODOPs) with path constraints in two iterative loops. In the outer loop, the adaptive$\varepsilon $-constraint method adaptively adjusts the choice of the parameters$\varepsilon $, which transfers MODOP into a sequence of single-objective dynamic optimization problems (SODOPs) with extra inequality constraints. In the inner loop, two different algorithms are used to solve the single-objective optimization problems. The first algorithm guarantees that the path constraints can be satisfied with any finite prescribed tolerance by replacing path constraints with a finite number of point constraints. Furthermore, the second algorithm guarantees that the path constraints are rigorously satisfied by enforcing the path constraints at a limited number of time points and by restricting the right-hand side of the path constraints. The proposed algorithms are proven to converge within finite iterations. The effectiveness of the algorithms is verified via numerical studies, along with a comparison to a state-of-the-art algorithm. Jun Fu 0001, Chenxuanyin Zou, Mingsheng Zhang, Xinglong Lu, Yuzhe Li 0003 |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. | 2 |