Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chenxuanyin Zou

dblp:340/5443 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7439-3551ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree
0.912025
Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
differentiable decision tree
0.912025
Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization
0.912025
Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

warm-start annealing · 0.9softmin approximation · 0.9ReLU+Argmin reformulation · 0.9GPU parallelism · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Differentiable Decision Tree via "ReLU+Argmin" Reformulation
abstract
Decision tree, despite its unmatched interpretability and lightweight structure, faces two key issues that limit its broader applicability: non-differentiability and low testing accuracy. This study addresses these issues by developing a differentiable oblique tree that optimizes the entire tree using gradient-based optimization. We propose an exact reformulation of hard-split trees based on "ReLU+Argmin" mechanism, and then cast the reformulated tree training as an unconstrained optimization task. The ReLU-based sample branching, expressed as exact-zero or non-zero values, preserve a unique decision path, in contrast to soft decision trees with probabilistic routing. The subsequent Argmin operation identifies the unique zero-violation path, enabling deterministic predictions. For effective gradient flow, we approximate Argmin behaviors by scaling softmin function. To ameliorate numerical instability, we propose a warm-start annealing scheme that solves multiple optimization tasks with increasingly accurate approximations. This reformulation alongside distributed GPU parallelism offers strong scalability, supporting 12-depth tree even on million-scale datasets where most baselines fail. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our optimized tree achieves a superior testing accuracy against 14 baselines, including an average improvement of 7.54\% over CART.
Qiangqiang Mao, Jiayang Ren, Yixiu Wang, Chenxuanyin Zou, Yankai Cao
NeurIPS4
2023 Multiobjective Dynamic Optimization of Nonlinear Systems With Path Constraints
abstract
In this article, two algorithms are proposed to solve multiobjective path-constrained dynamic optimization problems. In each algorithm, an adaptive$\varepsilon $-constraint method is employed to solve the multiobjective dynamic optimization problems (MODOPs) with path constraints in two iterative loops. In the outer loop, the adaptive$\varepsilon $-constraint method adaptively adjusts the choice of the parameters$\varepsilon $, which transfers MODOP into a sequence of single-objective dynamic optimization problems (SODOPs) with extra inequality constraints. In the inner loop, two different algorithms are used to solve the single-objective optimization problems. The first algorithm guarantees that the path constraints can be satisfied with any finite prescribed tolerance by replacing path constraints with a finite number of point constraints. Furthermore, the second algorithm guarantees that the path constraints are rigorously satisfied by enforcing the path constraints at a limited number of time points and by restricting the right-hand side of the path constraints. The proposed algorithms are proven to converge within finite iterations. The effectiveness of the algorithms is verified via numerical studies, along with a comparison to a state-of-the-art algorithm.
Jun Fu 0001, Chenxuanyin Zou, Mingsheng Zhang, Xinglong Lu, Yuzhe Li 0003
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst.2