Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wa Jin

dblp:340/8702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 44% Debugging and program repair · 44% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
dependency graph
0.712023
Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System Through Multimodal Data · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System Through Multimodal Data · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023
Services computing and microservices › microservice architecture
microservice failure diagnosis
0.712023
Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System Through Multimodal Data · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023
Debugging and program repair
root cause analysis
0.712023
Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System Through Multimodal Data · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph neural network · 1.3embedding · 1.3data augmentation · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System Through Multimodal Data
abstract
Automatic failure diagnosis is crucial for large microservice systems. Currently, most failure diagnosis methods rely solely on single-modal data (i.e., using either metrics, logs, or traces). In this study, we conduct an empirical study using real-world failure cases to show that combining these sources of data (multimodal data) leads to a more accurate diagnosis. However, effectively representing these data and addressing imbalanced failures remain challenging. To tackle these issues, we proposeDiagFusion, a robust failure diagnosis approach that uses multimodal data. It leverages embedding techniques and data augmentation to represent the multimodal data of service instances, combines deployment data and traces to build a dependency graph, and uses a graph neural network to localize the root cause instance and determine the failure type. Our evaluations using real-world datasets show thatDiagFusionoutperforms existing methods in terms of root cause instance localization (improving by 20.9% to 368%) and failure type determination (improving by 11.0% to 169%).
Shenglin Zhang, Pengxiang Jin, Yongqian Sun, Bicheng Zhang, Sibo Xia, Zhengdan Li, Zhenyu Zhong, Minghua Ma, Wa Jin, Dan Pei
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.10